|
Quiz: Wood, Communication Theories in Action - An Introduction 3e, Chapter 8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Right click so these operate outside Parkonline.org: Companion Site (Wood Textbook) click here. Companion Site (Case Studies) click here.
Upload
Portfolio Items to Dropbox "Portfolio"
- Handouts are in the DocSharing Online course planning http://onlineacademics.org/CA301/Intro.htm
229 Copley, 8700 NW River Park Drive, Park
University, Parkville, MO 64152 |
45% Minor Assignments, participation, quiz grades, Try-It-Outs. 10% Class Leadership on Cases and Written Reflections: Analyze the communication in a relationship (a case study of real or simulated interpersonal communication). 10% Presentation--Dinner with an Interpersonal Communication Theorist. 20% Portfolio with Research Paper (Core Assessment). 15% Final Exam |
|
Tentative Schedule
Week and Topic |
Monday Content Wood Chapter Reading |
Wednesday Cases B & W Cases Written reflection on your assigned cases are due the day you lead the class. |
Friday Applications Assignments due. Assessment for portfolio. |
|
1 Interpersonal Communication as a Field of Study. |
Skim webpage & course materials Chapter 1 |
Read Case 1 |
Upload to Portfolio in dropbox: example quiz, try-it-out, or in class learning activities.
1. Define communication and interpersonal communication and
differentiate them from other related terms, such as intercultural
communication or public relations. |
|
2 Understanding Interpersonal Communication Theories. |
Read chapter 2 |
Read Case 2 & 10 |
Upload to Portfolio in dropbox: example quiz, try-it-out, or in class learning activities. |
|
3 Building and Testing Theory. |
Read chapter 3 |
Read Case 3 |
Friday--independent group work day. |
|
4 Early Interpersonal Communication Theory. |
Read chapter 4 |
Read Case 4 |
Research for paper. Bring a good quality reference you will explain. Give us the correct APA listing via email. |
|
5 Theories about Symbolic Activity |
Read chapter 5 |
Read Case 5 & 8 |
Upload to Portfolio in dropbox: example quiz, try-it-out, or in class learning activities. |
|
6 Theories about Performance. |
Read chapter 6 |
Read Case 6 |
Work collectively on the research paper. |
|
7 Theories about How People Construct Meaning. |
Read chapter 7 |
Read Case 11 & 12 |
Upload to Portfolio in dropbox: example quiz, try-it-out, or in class learning activities. |
|
8 Theories of Interpersonal Dynamics. |
Read chapter 8 |
Read Case 7 |
Midterm Test |
|
9 Interpersonal Theories about Communication and the Evolution of Relationships. |
Read chapter 9 |
Read Case 13 Read Case 15 |
Upload to Portfolio in dropbox: example quiz, try-it-out, or in class learning activities. To prepare for your presentations next week, talk with your group members about your theorists. Write: Compare and contrast different theorist’s approaches to studying interpersonal communication. |
|
10
|
Presentations about Theorists
Group 1
Abdelhadi, Entesar |
Group 2
Johnston, Jennifer
|
Presentations Due
Group 3 |
|
11 Theories about Interpersonal Communities. |
Read chapter 10 |
Read Case 14 |
Work collectively on the research paper. |
|
12 Media Effects on Relationships |
Read chapter 11 |
|
Upload to Portfolio in dropbox: example quiz, try-it-out, or in class learning activities. Portfolio Research Paper Due |
|
13 Critical Communication Theories. |
Read chapter 12 |
Read Case 17 |
Upload to Portfolio in dropbox: example quiz, try-it-out, or in class learning activities. |
|
14 The Frontiers of Interpersonal Theory. |
Read chapter 13 |
Read Case 18 |
Upload to Portfolio in dropbox: example quiz, try-it-out, or in class learning activities. |
|
15 Communication Theories in Action: A Final Look. |
Read chapter 14 |
Course closure and review for final. |
No revision accepted after first class meeting of this week. |
|
16
|
n/a |
|
Final exam as scheduled. |
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS |

COURSE PLANNING DOCUMENTS
This page is my gift to you!To search this page, use "Control F" and enter keyword.
-Dr. Joan E. Aitken, Professor, Communication Arts, Park University, 229 Copley, 8700 NW River Park Drive, Parkville, MO 64152, 816-584-6785
|
Week 1
Chapter 1 Read Case 1 and use collaborative teamwork answer online. Write in a word processor! Then cut and paste into the online box. MAKE A COPY and put into your electronic portfolio. Chapter 1 quiz and one Try It Out assignment. MAKE COPIES AND Add quiz results and the Try-It-Out to portfolio. |
Wood Preface and Chapter 1 Lecture
|
Preface and Introduction |
|
Theories are interesting and relevant to everyday life.
We'll consider a limited number of theories, which are relevant to interpersonal communication and relationships.
We learn the history of an intellectual discipline to appreciate its identity.
Theories that have charted the communication field's evolution and led to its current status as an intellectually vibrant, socially relevant area of study and practice.
You may develop an appreciation of the PROCESS of theorizing as an intellectual activity.
You should gain insight into the concerns and goals that motivate scholars to develop theories.
|
Values of Studying Communication Theories |
|
Enhance your insight into the issues, principles, and problems that characterize the discipline today.
Enlarge your understanding of experiences in your personal life and lives of those around you.
|
Agree or Disagree? Theories and theorists vary widely not only in what they study but also in the fundamental assumptions they make about human nature, knowledge, communication, and the goals of the theory. What is your theory of interpersonal communication? Debate: Set up argument(s) in favor and argument(s) against and be prepared to argue either side. |
|
|
Chapter one: Communication as a Field of Study |
|
In 1970, Frank Dance, a communication theorist, counted over 100 definitions of communication proposed by experts in the field.
|
What do you think? We actively construct meaning.
Debate |
|
Communication is a systemic process in which individuals interact with and through symbols to create and interpret meanings.
Communication is a process, which means it is ongoing and always in motion.
Systemic means that communication involves a group of interrelated parts that affect one another.
Symbols are abstract, arbitrary, and ambiguous representations of other things.
Meaning is the heart of communication because we create it.

Communication with others not only affects our sense of identity but also directly influences our physical well-being. People who lack close friends have greater levels of anxiety and depression than people who are close to others.
|
|
Apply Research Findings Can you think of an example or story from your personal experience that supports scholarly research findings? Heart disease is more common among people who lack strong interpersonal relationships. People in disturbed relationships tend to have low self-esteem and more headaches, alcoholism, cancer, and sleep disorders. Arthritis patients who have good relationships with friends and loved ones have less severe symptoms and live longer. There is a link between good relationships and physical and mental health. Social isolation and lack of intimates are correlated with increased problems in physical and psychological well-being |
Importance of Communication:
Relationships
Professional Impact
Culture and Society
|
Relationships |
|
Communication critically affects our relationships. We build connections with others by revealing our private identities, remembering shared history planning a future, and working out problems and tensions.
Communication is essential for healthy and enduring relationships.
Good communication in intimate relationships involves listening skillfully, expressing your own ideas clearly, and responding with empathy and understanding.
Good relationships are about more than the big moments, but the mundane, small talk, routine talk that weaves lives together is essential.
For couples involved in long-distance romances, the biggest problems are missing the nonverbal communication that occurs in face-to-face interaction and not being able to share small talk.
|
Professional Impact |
|
Communication skills affect professional success.
No company is prepared to teach employees how to deal with people and communicate effectively.
|
Cultural Impact |
|
Communication skills are essential for a healthy society.
|
Breadth of the Communication Field All areas can affect interpersonal communication! |
|
Western traditions back to Aristotle who viewed communication as a practical art.
Intrapersonal communication
Our area of emphasis: Interpersonal communication.
Small group and teams
Public communication
Performance, including stories (narratives).
Media and new technologies. Media reinforce cultural stereotypes about race and ethnicity. Media can distort reality.
Organizational communication, including the personal relationships among coworkers, organizational culture (identity and codes of thought and action that are shared by members of an organization).
Intercultural communication. Less obvious are cultural differences between people who speak the "same" language. Within the US there are distinct communication cultures based on race, gender, affectional preferences, and ethnicity.
|
The Heart of Communication Research
|
|
Careers in Communication
Research
Public Relations
Advertising
Education
Human Relations
Management
|
Review chapter 1 |
Explain in your own words or give a personal example! |
|
communication |
A systemic process in which individuals interact with and through symbols to create and interpret meanings. |
|
fantasy theme |
An idea that spins out in a group and captures its social and task foci. |
|
intercultural communication |
The branch of communication field that studies communication among people from different cultures, including distinct cultures within a single country. |
|
interpersonal communication |
Communication between people. Interpersonal communication exists on a continuum ranging from impersonal (between social roles) to highly personal. |
|
intrapersonal communication |
Communication with oneself, including self-talk, planning, and reflections. |
|
meaning |
The significance conferred on experiences and phenomena; meaning is constructed, not intrinsic to communication. In general systems theory, communication has two levels of meaning: the content level, which concerns the information in a message; and the relationship level, which concerns what the message implies about the power, liking, and responsiveness between the communicators. |
|
monitoring |
Observing and managing our own thoughts, feelings, and actions. Monitoring is possible because humans are symbol users. |
|
organizational culture |
Understandings about identity and codes of thought and action that are shared by members of an organization. |
|
process |
The quality of being ongoing, in flux, ever changing. Communication is a process. |
|
symbol |
An arbitrary, ambiguous, and abstract representation of other phenomena. Symbols are the basis of language, much nonverbal behavior, and human thought. |
|
systemic |
Related to systems, which are organized and interacting wholes in which all parts interrelate. Communication is systemic. |
Case 1 Thought and Reflection
What are the reasons Madeline and Martin give for their married-name preferences?
Considering both Madeline’s and Martin’s perspectives, what are the possible decisions this couple might make?
In what ways do married-name choices suggest different types or styles of marriage relationships? Identify the characteristics of marriage for Martin and for Madeline.
To what degree can cultural issues affect married-name choices?
In this relationship what role does self-disclosure play in defining power and control in the process of decision making?
|
Based on a case study, discuss or write a summary of each of the following concepts:
Responsibilities in a Small Group*
Be committed to the group’s goals
Fulfill individual assignments
Avoid interpersonal conflicts
Encourage full participation
Keep the discussion on track *Lucas, S. E. (2004). The art of public speaking. (8th ed.) Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. |
|
|
COME PREPARED FOR OUR NEXT CLASS MEETING!
Learning theory suggests that students learn more if they review what they have just learned and if they preview and prepare for what they plan to learn.
1. Take several minutes to talk with your partner or group about what you have learned today.
2. Also, look ahead to what you need to do to prepare for the next class meeting. What do you already know about the next course topic? Discuss your experiences related to this topic. What assignment do you need to prepare for the next class meeting (e.g., reading, writing, speech)? If there is no specific assignment, what do you need to do to mentally prepare before class so you are an active learner?
"The sad truth is that excellence makes
people nervous." |
|
![]()
|
Week 2
|
|
Chapter
2 Lecture |
|
Review from last class: How does mediated communication affect interpersonal communication?
Consider this McLuhanish piece: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duplpYN5nmE
By way of introduction into theory building, do you have a theory about nonverbal communication? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfDWQG47pAQ&feature=PlayList&p=F35C9F56FDB8A863&playnext=1&index=15
People act on theories, often without realizing it in their everyday lives.
Theories are attempts to make sense of things.
A theory offers an account of what something is, how it operates.
Theories are human constructions--symbolic ways we represent phenomena.
|
Goals of theories
|
|
|
Teamwork! Complete this learning activity collaborating with other students in the class. Each student needs to be actively engaged and carry his or her share of the work responsibility. Have one person act as the recorder, who type your answer after class, email it to the group members, who then can modify the assignment and put it in their ePortfolios. See p. 39, Try it Out ASSIGNMENT: Develop a theory of communication for your classroom.
|
|
|
Standards for evaluating theories:
|
|
SCOPE
Scope refers to the
range of phenomena a theory describes and explains.
Some theories focus on very narrow realms of communication, and others advance grand perspectives.
How well does a theory answer questions: The WHAT question and the HOW or WHY question?
A theory clarifies what it considers ESSENTIAL in communication.
Laws-based explanations argument that anytime x happens, y will follow, or that x and y are usually related. Laws-based explanations may be either causal or correlational.
There are no universal laws in communication.
Rules-based explanations aim to articulate the patterns that describe and explain what happens in a specific type of communication situation or relationship. Thus, RULES have a more restricted scope than LAWS. Rules are regularities.
TESTABILITY
Can the theory be tested?
PARSIMONY
Parsimony refers to appropriate simplicity.
UTILITY
Is there practical value? Kurt Lewin said that there is nothing so
practical as a good theory.
HEURISM
Provokes new ideas, insights, thinking, and research.

|
BALANCING CRITERIA |
A particular theory may fare well on some of the above criteria and poorly on others.
Theories, like foods, can be assessed in different ways that lead us to different conclusions about their merit.
|
PERSPECTIVE FOR STUDYING POINTS OF VIEW |
Theorists choose which kind of communication to focus on. Theorists make different choices about what they will focus on in studying a particular kind of communication.
Theorists also vary in the goals they pursue.
Theorists differ in what they regard as a good explanation.
Some theories cannot work together because they reflect fundamentally opposed views of human beings or of knowledge (p. 47).
A theory asks particular questions.
![]()
|
Review Chapter 2 |
Explain in your own words or give a personal example! |
|
causal |
A form of explanation that asserts that one phenomenon directly determines another. |
|
control |
The use of explanations and predictions to govern what a phenomenon actually does. |
|
correlational |
A form of explanation that asserts that two things go together but not that one causes the other. |
|
description |
One goal of theory; the use of symbols to represent something and to identify its parts. |
|
explanation |
One goal of theorizing; an effort to account for why and/or how something works. |
|
heurism |
A criterion for evaluating theories; the capacity of a theory to provoke new insights, thoughts, and understandings. |
|
laws-based explanation |
A theoretical explanation of the form," Anytime x happens, y will invariably or probably follow, "or "x and y always or almost always go together." |
|
parsimony |
One criterion for evaluating theories; the appropriate simplicity of a theory. |
|
prediction |
Projecting what will happen to a phenomenon under specified conditions or exposure to particular stimuli. |
|
reform |
One goal of theorizing; the use of theory to instigate change in pragmatic life. Also called "producing positive social change." |
|
rules-based explanation |
A form of theoretical explanation that articulates regularities, or patterns, in human behavior that are routinely followed in particular types of communication situations and relationships. |
|
scope |
One criterion for evaluating theories; the range of phenomena a theory describes and explains. |
|
testability |
The extent to which a theory's claims can be appraised. Testability is one criterion for evaluating a theory. |
|
theory |
An account of what something is, how it works, what it produces or causes to happen, and what can change how it operates. Theories are points of view, human constructions. |
|
understanding |
One goal of theorizing; gaining insight into a process, situation, or phenomenon, not necessarily with the goal of predicting or controlling it. |
|
utility |
A criterion for evaluating theories; practical merit or applied value of a theory. |
Case 2 For Further Thought and Reflection
In what ways are disabled people stigmatized by their disabilities? How do others treat them and communicate with them?
What kinds of situations are particularly problematic for persons with disabilities, especially in regard to helping and maintaining privacy?
Some of the other cases in this book identify competing dialectical tensions that exist within relationships—independence—dependence, openness—closedness, stability—change. Which of these dialectical tensions do we see in Steve’s and Jim’s experiences?
What experiences have you had with individuals with disabilities? Does this case help you think about alternative ways of communicating with disabled people? How do you think they would like you to interact with them?
What impact do disability and communication patterns, as they are affected by disability, have on identity and self-esteem?
Do you think Steve’s parents made the best decision when they elected to keep Steve at home rather than institutionalizing him?
Case 10 Thought and Reflection
It is said that communication rules help prescribe rules for behavior. What general communication rules do you see operating throughout this case?
It is said that communication rules are used to evaluate, justify, correct, predict, and/or explain behavior. How do communication rules in this case function to evaluate, justify, correct, predict and explain behaviors?
What implicit (unstated prescriptions for behavior) and explicit (clearly stated prescriptions for behavior) rules did you see? Which appear to have more importance?
When is it appropriate to break rules? How were rules broken in this case?
Rules of organizational socialization (e.g., learning the ropes of how to behave in a new situation) are discussed in this case. How might the types of socialization rules identified here apply to other situations and contexts?
Sororities and other organizations often have relatively formal rules for when and how to communicate. In more casual relationships, rules tend to be less formal, conscious and explicit but equally present. Identify rules that guide how you and others act when your family has dinner, or when you and friends go out to dinner together.
|
Collaborative Teamwork Discuss or write a summary of each of the following concepts:
Responsibilities in a Small Group*
Be committed to the group’s goals
Fulfill individual assignments
Avoid interpersonal conflicts
Encourage full participation
Keep the discussion on track *Lucas, S. E. (2004). The art of public speaking. (8th ed.) Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. |
|
|
COME PREPARED FOR OUR NEXT CLASS MEETING!
Learning theory suggests that students learn more if they review what they have just learned and if they preview and prepare for what they plan to learn.
1. Take several minutes to talk with your partner or group about what you have learned today.
2. Also, look ahead to what you need to do to prepare for the next class meeting. What do you already know about the next course topic? Discuss your experiences related to this topic. What assignment do you need to prepare for the next class meeting (e.g., reading, writing, speech)? If there is no specific assignment, what do you need to do to mentally prepare before class so you are an active learner?
"The sad truth is that excellence makes
people nervous." |
|
|
Week 3
|
Try It Out:
Be sure to submit through the online form and put your full name on the first line in the answer box.
Part A--Write a summary of yourself as an interpersonal communicator.
Part B--Write about interpersonal communication memories, observations, and experiences that may help you define yourself that way.
Begin every sentence with "I Remember"
You might think about the style of Lisa Hannigan's I Remember http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEV5WSBmhIA
I remember it well
The first time that I saw
Your head around the door
'Cause mine stopped working
I remember it well
There was wet in your hair
I was stood in stare
And time stopped moving
I remember it well
Taxied out of a storm
To watch you perform
And my ships were sailing
I remember it well
I was stood in your line
And your mouth, your mouth, your mind...
|
Chapter 3 Lecture Building and Testing Theory |
|
Question!
Do theories of human communication describe how humans actually communicate?
Or do they reflect individual theorists' perceptions and perspectives?
What do you think?!?! |
|
VIEWS OF HUMAN NATURE
Ontology are assumptions about human nature. The assumptions theorists make about humans can't be proved or disproved scientifically; they are matters of faith or belief.
DETERMINISM--------
-----FREE
WILL
Determinism assumes that human behavior is governed by forces beyond individual control, usually the twin forces of biology and environment.
On the other end of the ontological spectrum is the belief that humans have free will and that they make choices about how to act.
For Heidegger, thrownness refers to the fact that we are thrown into a multitude of arbitrary conditions that influence our lives and opportunities.
TRY IT OUT p. 55
WAYS OF KNOWING
Epistemology: the branch of philosophy that deals with knowledge, and is concerned with how we know.
DISCOVERING TRUTH
There is a singular truth. Objectivism is the belief that reality is material and external to the human mind.
Objectivity the quality of being uninfluenced by values, biases, personal feelings, and other subjective factors when perceiving material reality.
Believers in objective truth presume that the true nature, or meaning of any act of communication can be determined.

CREATING MEANING
Those who believe that there are multiple realities would regard it as
entirely reasonable that different people interpret communication in
varying ways.
Standpoint theory--the material, social, and symbolic circumstances of a social group shape what its members experience, as well as how they think, act, and feel.
|
Is knowledge based on the existence of phenomena (the falling tree) or on human perceptions (hearing it fall). There are different opinions about what counts as knowledge and how we come to know what we think we know.
POSITION ONE:
OBJECTIVITY
Debate! |
|
PURPOSES OF THEORY
University Laws
A law is an inviolate, unalterable fact that holds true across time and space.
Universal laws may be more applicable to natural science than to human behavior, including communication.
Situated Rules
There are no laws that explain human communication across all time and circumstances.
We seek theories as the articulation of rules that describe patterns in human behavior.
|
Question! What should the focus be for theorists? Behavior? Meanings behind behavior? A combination of behavior and meaning? What do you think?!?! |
|
Behaviorism: A form of science that focuses on observable behaviors and that assumes meanings, motives, and other subjective phenomena either don't exist or are irrelevant.
Behaviorists believe that scientists can study only concrete behaviors, such as what people do or say.
Human motives, meanings, and intentions are beyond the realm of behavioristic investigation.
Skinner believed that human behavior is a response to external stimuli. He was well known for referring to the mind as a "black box," the contents of which cannot be known and which are irrelevant to science.
All that can be measured is concrete, objective behavior.
|
Agree or Disagree? Theories and theorists vary widely not only in what they study but also in the fundamental assumptions they make about human nature, knowledge, communication, and the goals of the theory. Meaning, motive, and intentions, even if they exist, aren't measurable, so they aren't within the province of science (p. 62). |
|
MEANINGS
Many scholars aren't convinced that behaviorism is desirable. Theorists who reject behavioral views of science believe that the crux of human activity is meaning, not behaviors themselves. What is distinctively human is free will or the ability to make choices and the capacity to create meanings (crucial to humanists).
John Searle wrote about brute facts, which are the objective, concrete phenomena or observable behaviors that behaviorists study. Institutional facts are what brute facts MEAN, what humanists wish to study.
|
Teamwork! Complete this learning activity collaborating with other students in the class. Each student needs to be actively engaged and carry his or her share of the work responsibility.
TRY IT OUT p. 63 Provide a description based on
only brute facts and a second description based on institutional facts. A marriage
ceremony. A person
interacting in a chat room. Two
friends engaging in a game of friendly insults and put-downs.
|
|
TESTING THEORIES
HYPOTHESES AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Hypotheses are testable predictions about relationships between communication phenomena.
If you don't have a clear basis for making a prediction, generate a research question. Use research questions in your action research.
DEFINE TERMS: Operational definitions are precise descriptions that specify the phenomena of interest.
QUANTITATIVE METHODS gather information that can be quantified and then interpret eh data to make arguments about what the numbers reveal about communication behaviors and relationships among communication phenomena.
DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS use numbers to describe human behavior.
|
|
Apply Research Findings Can you think of an example or story from your personal experience that supports scholarly research findings?
Husbands interrupt wives far more often than wives interrupt husbands.
Women are more active than men in doing what is called "conversational maintenance," which is involving others in conversations. |
Social desirability bias is when subjects give responses that they think are socially acceptable but which may not be totally honest.
An experiment is a controlled study that systematically manipulates one thing (called an independent variable) to determine how that affects another thing (called a dependent variable, for what it does depends on the independent variable).
Dependent variable
affects
independent variable.
|
|
Apply Research Findings Can you think of an example or story from your personal experience that supports scholarly research findings? Acitelli found that both partners found it satisfying to talk about the relationship when there was a problem. When no conflict or difficulty existed, however, the wives in the scenarios were perceived as being more satisfied with conversation about the relationship. |
QUALITATIVE METHODS
Valuable when we wish not to count or measure phenomena but to understand the character of experience, particularly how people perceive and make sense of their communication experience.
Textual analysis--also called interpretative analysis--involves describing communication texts and interpreting their meaning.
|
|
Apply Research Findings Can you think of an example or story from your personal experience that supports scholarly research findings? Men often interrupt to challenge others or to assert themselves. Women's interruptions are more likely to support others or to indicate interest in what others are saying. |
Ethnography attempts to discover what things mean to others by sensitive observation of human activity. They rely on unobtrusive methods, which are means of gathering data that intrude minimally on naturally occurring interaction.
Critical analysis suggests that research should make a real difference in the lives of human beings. Critical scholarship is one important way to change oppressive or wrong practices in the world.
ASSESSING RESEARCH
Validity refers to the truth or accuracy of a theory in measuring what it claims to measure.
External validity refers to the generalizability of a theory. Internal validity is that the theory's design and methods do what they claim to do.
Reliability is the consistency.
Significance is the conceptual or pragmatic importance of a theory.
![]()
|
Review Chapter 3 |
Explain in your own words or give a personal example! |
|
behaviorism |
A form of science that focuses on observable behaviors and that assumes human motives, meanings, feelings, and other subjective phenomena either don't exist or are irrelevant to behavior. |
|
brute fact |
An objective, concrete phenomenon unadorned by interpretations of meaning. |
|
critical analysis |
Research that goes beyond description and explanation to argue for changes in communicative practices that are judged to be oppressive, wrong, or otherwise undesirable. |
|
descriptive statistics |
Numerical representations of human behavior that describe populations, proportions, and frequencies. |
|
determinism |
The belief that human behavior is governed by forces beyond individual control, usually biology, environment, or a combination of the two. |
|
epistemology |
The branch of philosophy that deals with the nature of knowledge, or how we know what we know. |
|
ethnography |
A qualitative method of research that interprets actions so as to generate understanding consistent with the frameworks of those who perform the actions. |
|
experiment |
A controlled study that systematically manipulates one thing (called the independent variable) to determine how it affects another thing (called the dependent variable because what it does depends on the independent variable). |
|
external validity |
The generalizability of a theory across contexts, especially those beyond the confines of experimental situations. |
|
gender |
A socially created system of values, identities, and behaviors that are prescribed for women and men. Unlike sex, which is biologically determined, gender is socially constructed. |
|
humanism |
A form of science that focuses on human choices, motives, and meanings and assumes that the reasons or causes of human behavior lie within humans, not outside of them. |
|
hypothesis |
A carefully stated, testable prediction of a theoretical relationship or outcome. |
|
institutional fact |
The meaning of an act, event, or other phenomenon; interpretations of brute facts. |
|
internal validity |
The degree to which the design and methods used to test a theory actually measure what they claim to measure. |
|
law |
An inviolate, unalterable fact that holds true across time and space. Also called universal law and covering law. |
|
meaning |
The significance conferred on experiences and phenomena; meaning is constructed, not intrinsic to communication. In general systems theory, communication has two levels of meaning: the content level, which concerns the information in a message; and the relationship level, which concerns what the message implies about the power, liking, and responsiveness between the communicators. |
|
objectivism |
The belief that reality is material, external to the human mind, and the same for everyone. |
|
objectivity |
The quality of being uninfluenced by values, biases, personal feelings, and other subjective factors. |
|
ontology |
The branch of philosophy that deals with the nature of humans. |
|
operational definition |
A precise description that specifies how to observe the phenomena of interest. Operational definitions provide clarity and precision to research hypotheses and research questions used to test theory. |
|
qualitative methods |
Forms of research that involve probing and interpreting the subjective meanings of experience. |
|
quantitative methods |
Forms of research that involve gathering quantifiable data. |
|
reliability |
A criterion for evaluating theoretical research that concerns the consistency of particular behaviors, patterns, or relationships. |
|
research question |
A question that specifies the phenomena of interest to a scholar but does not predict relationships between phenomena. Research questions are less formal than hypotheses. |
|
sex |
The biological and genetic quality of maleness or femaleness; not the same as gender. |
|
significance |
The conceptual or pragmatic importance of a theory. |
|
social desirability bias |
A tendency for research participants to give responses that they perceive as socially acceptable, which may not be honest. |
|
standpoint theory |
The view that the material, social, and symbolic circumstances of a social group shape what members of that group experience, as well as how they think, act, and feel. |
|
survey |
A quantitative method of research that relies on instruments, questionnaires, or interviews to find out about feelings, experiences, and so forth. |
|
text |
All symbolic activities, written, oral, or nonverbal; a form of data useful in qualitative research. |
|
thrownness |
The arbitrary conditions of the particular time and place of an individual's life. |
|
unobtrusive methods |
Means of gathering data that intrude minimally on naturally occurring interaction. |
|
validity |
A criterion for evaluating a theory. Validity has both internal (the theory measures what it claims to measure) and external (the theory applies to real life beyond the laboratory) dimensions. |
|
Coffee and Conversation In pairs, discuss case study 3. Discuss what you know and what you think with another person in the class.
"Saying what we think gives us a wider conversational range than saying
what we know."
Case 3 Thought and Reflection
|
|
|
Collaborative Teamwork Use a case study to complete the following analysis.
. |
|
![]()
|
Week 4
|
|
Chapter 4 Lecture An Early Communication Theory: General Semantics |
Even though general semantics is no longer influential in the field of communication, it made and makes valuable contributions to our understanding of what happens when people talk to one another.
CHARACTER OF SYMBOLS
Symbols are arbitrary.
Symbols are abstract.
Symbols are ambiguous.
Videos Clips
Consider this clip from No Country for Old Men http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP1v85pUuoI
|
Teamwork! Please answer Chapter 4 TIO Activity 1. Submit through the system.
Complete this learning activity collaborating with other students in the class. Each student needs to be actively engaged and carry his or her share of the work responsibility. TRY IT OUT, p. 79 Each individual needs to write a definition of each of the following words or phrases. Committed relationship Men's communication. Women's communication. Compare your definitions with those of other students in your group. How do your meanings differ? How might your and others' standpoints explain the differences? |
|
|
HOW SHOULD WE SAY IT?!?! Work with team members to collaboratively write appropriate language for the following circumstances. Select a spokesperson to share the groups words for each item.
|
|
Meanings are contextual.
Korzybski believed that communication problems often occur when we rely on our maps, or words, to assign meanings instead of referring to the territories, or actual phenomena of experience.
Intension-al orientations to communication and meanings are based on internal factors, or what's inside of us--our own definitions, associations, and fields of experience related to words we speak, hear, and read.
Extension-al orientations are based on observation and attention to objective particulars that distinguish phenomena from one another.

Remedies for Misunderstanding
Etc.
Indexing
Feedforward--anticipate effects of communication and adapt to the anticipated effects in advance.
|
General Semantics is an important theory in communication studies. v. General Semantics has no value as a theory today.
Debate! |
|
Critical Assessment of General Semantics
Too simplistic.
Misrepresents the character of symbols and language.
Lacks applied value.
![]()
|
Review chapter 4 |
Explain in your own words or give a personal example! |
|
extensional orientation |
A view of meaning and communication that is based on objective particulars of phenomena. |
|
feedforward |
In general semantics theory, the process of anticipating the effects of communication and adapting it in advance of actually engaging in communication. |
|
indexing |
Associating referents (such as names) with specific dates, situations, and so forth to remind ourselves that meanings change; advocated by general semanticists as a remedy for misunderstanding. |
|
intensional orientation |
A view of meaning and communication that is based on factors inside individuals (biases, experiences, etc.). |
Case 4 Thought and Reflection
Colbert Christmas Special http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJQYXghcNvo
Daily Show http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=one%20tree%20hill%20christmas&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wv#q=+hanukkah++christmas+colbert&hl=en&emb=0 More http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=colbert+christmas+special&www_google_domain=www.google.com&hl=en&emb=0&aq=1&oq=colbert+c#q=colbert+christmas+special&www_google_domain=www.google.com&hl=en&emb=0&aq=1&oq=colbert+c&start=10
What does it mean to be Jewish and American in a Christian-dominated society?
Which subtle stereotypes of Jewish Americans have you heard personally or seen in the media?
Does Sara’s way of experiencing her religion distance herself from her community?
Have you dated a person from other racial, ethnic, or religious culture? If the answer is yes, did you face any situation similar to the one experienced by Sara. If the answer is no, why not?
Do you believe most women cannot fully identify with a purely male God? Do you support efforts to make translations of religious books more inclusive of women and men?
Are there challenges with being female and belonging to your own religion?
|
Collaborative Teamwork As an active group member, complete this learning activity collaborating with other students in the class. Each student needs to be actively engaged and carry his or her share of the work responsibility.
Use a case study to complete the following analysis.
Identify eight concepts/terms associated with interpersonal communication demonstrated in this case study. |
|
|
Week 5
Narrative as Bloodsport http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn6NB98NY78 Narrative andCommunication Animation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9c_PwUIC_g8
Read and discuss Case 5
Offspring Music Video--Self Esteem http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kIZeVoRBuU http://www.6lyrics.com/music/the_offspring/lyrics/self_esteem_complete_lyrics.aspx
|
|
Chapter 5 Lecture Theories About Symbolic Activity |
Mead regarded symbols as the foundation of both personal and social life (symbolic interactionism).
Mind and self are acquired in the process of interacting with others.
Mind is the ability to use symbols that have common social meanings.
Self is the ability to reflect on ourselves from the perspective of others.
Looking glass self. Symbolic interactionists explain that we learn to see ourselves mirrored in others' eyes. Our perception of how others see us are lenses through which we perceive ourselves.
Self-fulfilling prophecy is when individuals live up to the labels others impose on them.
Humans have the distinctive ability to be both the subjects and the objects of their experience.

Pablo Picasso, entitled Girl Before a Mirror http://www.artlex.com/ArtLex/m/images/mirror_picass_girlbefore_lg.jpg
I is impulsive, creative, spontaneous, and generally unburdened by social
individuality and of criminal and immoral behavior.
ME is the socially conscious part of the self, who reflects on the I's impulses and actions.
The ME is analytical, evaluative, and above all aware of social conventions, rules, and expectations.
Mead saw the I and the ME as complementary.
Symbolic interactionists claim that our meanings for things reflect the perspectives of both particular others and the generalized other. Individuals also use the perspective of the generalized other to decide what things mean.

HOW PEOPLE CREATE MEANING
People act on the basis of what things mean to them. Thus, meanings are the basis of behavior, including communication.
Symbolic interactionist claim that meanings are formed in the process of interacting symbolically with others in a society.
Symbolic interactionists believe that the meanings individuals confer on experiences, feelings, events, activities, other people, and themselves reflect the internalized perspectives of particular others and the generalized other.

Symbolic interactionists believe that people act on the basis of what things mean to them AND that meanings are formed in the process of interacting symbolically with others in a society.
Blumer insists that individuals construct their action through a process of personal interpretation.
|
Agree or Disagree? Theories and theorists vary widely not only in what they study but also in the fundamental assumptions they make about human nature, knowledge, communication, and the goals of the theory. Critical Assessment of Symbolic Interactionism The Theory has
conceptual inconsistencies. The theory is to vague and broad. The theory neglects self-esteem. Has little to say about how various experiences and others' labels for us enhance or diminish self-esteem. |
|
|
DRAMATISM - Burke |
|
Life is a drama, which involves conflict and division that threatens some existing form of order.
|
IDENTIFICATION |
All things have substance, which is the general nature or essence of a thing.
Consubstantiality is identification with each other. Consubstantiality is what makes communication possible. We can understand one another only because there is some overlap in individuals' substances (experiences, language, goals).
Communication can't be perfects, because there are also differences and divisions that keep individuals from being completely consubstantial.
Communication is the primary way that we increase our identification, or consubstantiality, with others and diminish our division, or separateness, from others.
Division is always present and is the impetus for communication that seeks to build identification.
|
GUILT |
Guilt is the central motive for human action, specifically communication.
Any tension, discomfort, sense of shame, or other unpleasant feeling that humans experience is guilt.
In Burke's judgment, we continuously feel guilt and are continually attempting to purge ourselves of the discomfort it causes.
|
HIERARCHY |
Language allows us to create categories and evaluations that are the basis of social hierarchies, such as socioeconomic classes, title in organizations, and degrees of status and power.
|
PERFECTION |
Our symbols allow us to conceive and name perfect forms or ideals that are at the top of the hierarchy: a flawless relationship, a completely egalitarian society, your ideal weight, a perfect LSAT score, a world free of war.
Guilt arises because of the gap between what is in the case (personal shortcomings,
imperfections in relationships, social inequities) and the perfection that we
can imagine.
|
THE NEGATIVE |
The moral capacity to say "no," "not," and "thou shalt not." Moral judgments.
|
PURGING GUILT |
Purging guilt becomes the principal goal of communication.
First, we may engage in mortification, which is blaming ourselves.
Victimage is identifying an external source for some apparent failing or sin.
Victimage often takes the form of scapegoating, the placing of sins into a sacrificial vessel whose destruction serves to cleanse an individual or group of sin.
|
THE DRAMATISTIC PENTAD (HEXAD) |
ACT is what is done by a person.
SCENE is the context.
AGENT is the individual or group that performs an act.
AGENCY is the means an agent uses to accomplish an act (channel).
PURPOSE is the goal of the act.
ATTITUDE is how an actor positions herself or himself relative to others and the contexts in which she or he operates. Added later, thus the hexad.
RATIO is a proportion that shows the emphasis of an element in the pentad.
|
Agree or Disagree? Theories and theorists vary widely not only in what they study but also in the fundamental assumptions they make about human nature, knowledge, communication, and the goals of the theory. Burke's dramatism is the most comprehensive theory of symbolic action. Reservations:
|
|
|
NARRATIVE THEORY Walter Fisher |
"Humans are by nature storytelling beings and that the narrative capacity is what is most basic and most distinctive about humans. According to Fisher, humans are storytelling animals. Fisher (1987) believed that we make sense of our experiences in life by transforming them into stories, or narrative form. . . .Storytelling, in other words, is an ongoing human activity, one as natural and nearly as continuous breathing" (Wood, 2004, p. 105).
"Humans are wonderfully creative and imaginative beings. . . .We are able to invent and accept new stories when they better explain our lives or offer better directions for future living than the stories we have grown up hearing and believing" (p. 113).

|
Debate!
|
|
NARRATIVE RATIONALITY
Not all stories are equally compelling. We judge stories on the basis of a distinctively narrative form of rationality, thought to be quite different from conventional criteria of rationality. The two standards for assessing narrative rationality are coherence and fidelity.
COHERENCE: Do all parts of the story seem to fit together believable?

FIDELITY: The extent to which a story resonates with listeners' personal
experiences and beliefs.
|
Question!
"Most of the major advances in
social life have come about because people told new stories that contested popular views and established ideas about life" (Wood, 2004,
p. 113). What do you think?!?! |
|
CRITICAL ASSESSMENT
Incomplete description.
Too broad.
Conservative bias (preservation of existing or established values and practices).
ACTIVITY: Tell a story that demonstrates the importance of storytelling in communication. To make sense of the content of this course, students are encouraged to tell stories from their experience, relay stories from reading autobiographic or biographic information, discuss case studies, and listen to the stories of others. When you tell the story, be sure to explain how you think the story relates to the course content.

|
Review chapter 5 |
Explain in your own words or give a personal example! |
|
act |
One element in the dramatistic pentad; that which is done. |
|
agency |
One element in the dramatistic pentad; the means or channel through which an act is performed. |
|
agent |
One element in the dramatistic pentad; the one who performs an act. |
|
attitude |
In the dramatistic hexad, incipient action based on how an actor positions herself or himself relative to others and the contexts in which she or he acts; the sixth element that Kenneth Burke added to the original dramatistic pentad, making it a hexad. |
|
coherence |
In narrative theory, a standard for judging the quality of a story according to whether it is internally consistent, complete, and believable. |
|
consubstantiality |
In dramatism, identifying with another or becoming common in substance. |
|
dramatism |
The point of view that life is a drama that can be understood in dramatic terms such as act, agent, scene, agency, and purpose. Identification is viewed as the primary goal of symbolic interaction, and guilt is viewed as the ultimate motive for communication. |
|
dramatistic pentad (hexad) |
The method of conducting dramatistic analysis of communication in terms of act, scene, agent, agency, and purpose. Later, attitude was added as a sixth element of the method, making it a hexad. |
|
fidelity |
In narrative theory, one standard for judging a story's quality according to whether it "rings true." |
|
generalized other |
In symbolic interaction theory, the organized perspectives of a social group, community, or society. |
|
guilt |
In dramatism, any tension, discomfort, sense of shame, or other unpleasant feeling that humans experience; the motive of all human action. |
|
hierarchy |
In dramatism, a social ordering in which phenomena, including people, are classified into groups with different value, status, or rank. |
|
Interaction |
In symbolic interaction theory, the phase or part of self that is impulsive, creative, and unconstrained by social norms and knowledge. |
|
looking glass self |
In symbolic interaction theory, the image of oneself that one gains by seeing the self mirrored in others' eyes. |
|
ME |
In symbolic interaction theory, the phase or part of self that is socially aware, analytical, and evaluative. |
|
mind |
In symbolic interaction theory, the ability to use significant symbols. Mind is acquired through symbolic interaction with others. |
|
mortification |
In dramatism, a method of purging guilt by blaming ourselves, confessing failings, and seeking forgiveness. |
|
narrative paradigm/narrative theory |
The point of view that humans are natural storytellers and that most, if not all, communication is storytelling. |
|
narrative rationality |
In narrative theory, the judgment of the quality of narratives, or stories, according to their coherence and fidelity. |
|
negative |
In dramatism, the capacity to say no; the basis of moral conduct and thought. |
|
particular other |
In symbolic interaction theory, an individual who is significant to another person. |
|
perfection |
In dramatism, our imagined ideal or perfect form of things and ourselves. The inability to achieve perfection is a source of guilt. |
|
purpose |
One element in the dramatistic pentad; the reason for an act. |
|
ratio |
In dramatism, the proportion of different elements in the dramatistic pentad. |
|
role taking |
In symbolic interaction theory, an individual's internalization and perception of experiences from the perspective of another person or persons. |
|
scapegoating |
In dramatism, displacing sins into a sacrificial vessel whose destruction serves to cleanse an individual or group of its sins. |
|
scene |
In the dramatistic pentad, the context in which an act is performed. |
|
self |
In symbolic interaction theory, the ability to reflect on oneself from the perspective of others. Self is not present at birth but is acquired through symbolic interactions with others. |
|
self-fulfilling prophecy |
Behaving and seeing ourselves in ways that are consistent with how others label us. |
|
substance |
In dramatism, the general nature or essence of some thing or person. |
|
symbolic interactionism/symbolic interaction theory |
The point of view that claims society predates individuals, who acquire minds and selves in the process of interacting symbolically with other members of a culture. Symbols are also necessary to the functioning and continuation of collective life. |
|
victimage |
In dramatism, a method of purging guilt by identifying an external source (a scapegoat) for some apparent failing or sin. |
Case 5 Thought and Reflection
How does Reece’s intrapersonal communication about her weight affect her self-esteem? What messages does she send herself repeatedly that affect her self-esteem? Where do these messages come from?
How does your communication with yourself and with others affect your identity? What role does communication play in shaping your identity?
Not all people feel the same pressure to be thin. How much pressure do you and your friends feel to be thin? Do you hear people talking about wanting to be thin and measuring themselves against impossible standards? What might account for some people feeling an intense amount of pressure and others not feeling any pressure?
In this case, Reece strongly wants to lose weight and expresses her willingness to "do whatever it takes" to be thin. Do you think her desire and her behavior are unhealthy? Does her friend Emma have a responsibility to say something to Reece about her behavior? What do you think Emma should do to keep her friend from hurting herself?
What racial/ethnic differences in views toward weight can you see in the students’ questions and comments in class? What might explain the racial/ethnic differences in views toward weight?

Case 8 Thought and Reflection
When Katherine and her parents are getting ready to leave for college, Katherine chooses not to respond to her father’s self-disclosing statements. She also chooses several times not to disclose to Kim, her roommate, or to Russ. What are the drawbacks to disclosing that might have motivated her to remain private?
During her first few days at Western State University, Katherine makes decisions about disclosing to her mother, Kim, Russ, and Dr. O’Neill. What are the possible benefits for Katherine of self-disclosing? Why did it seem easier for her to self-disclose to her mother, Kim, and Dr. O’Neill than to Russ?
Dr. O’Neill’s four guidelines for considering when to self-disclose were provided in the context of whether Katherine should disclose to Russ. How do the guidelines apply to Katherine and Kim’s relationship?
How do Kim and Katherine use self-disclosure to create impressions with each other and with others on campus?
Self-disclosing communication can vary in intensity, in the degree to which it is personal. How does self-disclosure reflect the way in which Katherine and Kim’s relationship develops, and how does it help them create a more trusting and intimate relationship?
|
Collaborative Teamwork As an active group member, complete this learning activity collaborating with other students in the class. Each student needs to be actively engaged and carry his or her share of the work responsibility.
Use a case study to complete the following analysis.
|
|
|
Week 6
Last week we discussed social interaction and narrative theories. In the cases we talked about Self-esteem and Self Disclosure. Sam Malone self discloses http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxgwB_mDWWk This week we discuss chapter 6 (Performance Theories)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atEpSjKJ4y0 Seven and Human Dating RitualsUC Irvine's "Dugout Captain" Zach Robinson explains and demonstrates the Anteaters' dugout rituals.
Chapter 6 Try It Out and Quiz.
Read Case 6 on religious conversation and discuss collaboratively.
Mary J. Blige - No More Drama http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZ9uCiPBIWcStephen Baldwin interview on his religious conversation. http://video.msn.com/video.aspx?mkt=en-us&vid=a1ed672f-f667-43fc-a8f6-abfcd9f7c61b
|
|
Chapter 6 Lecture: Theories about Performance |
All of us create and project images that suit our purposes in various moments.
Turner defined humans as homo performans to emphasize that humans are defined by their participation in rituals, social drama, and improvisational, creative performances in daily life.
Dramaturgy is performances in everyday life.
Performance ethnography explores how social communities are sustained and their values expressed and sometimes changed through performative practices such as rituals, ceremonies, rites of cultural practice, and oral history.

|
DRAMATURGICAL THEORY (PERFORMANCE IN EVERYDAY LIFE) |
Goffman: "It is social situations that provide the natural theatre in which all bodily displays are enacted and in which all bodily displays are read."
FRAMES are models we rely on to make sense of experience.
Frames typically reflect cultural knowledge; they vary from culture to culture.
"IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT is the process of managing setting, words, nonverbal communication, and dress in an effort to create a particular image of individuals and situations. According to Goffman (1959), our efforts to create and project certain impressions may be either highly calculated or unintentional" (Wood, 2004, p. 119-120). In this class, you are in-training to be a communication or business professional, so you need to pay attention to how you are managing your image and impression, particularly when making a presentation to the class.
|
TRY IT OUT p. 119 Describe a
first date using Goffman's dramaturgical model. What impression do you want to project to your date? What definition of the situation do you want your date to accept? How do
you manage your dress, gestures, and words to project that impression of yourself? How do
you control the setting to support the image of yourself and the
situation that you want to project to your date? What can you not do if you want to sustain the desired impression of
yourself? (Wood,
2004, p. 119) |
|
|
Debate! Impression management is manipulative and deceitful in interpersonal communication contexts. OR
Impression management is highly constructive because it allows us and
others to behave in socially appropriate and beneficial ways. Prepare to argue BOTH SIDES of the concept, idea, definition, or theory. What are three argument(s) in favor or support of this idea AND three argument(s)) against or in disagreement of this idea. Also think of one example or anecdote from your personal experience, for each side of the argument. Two people may be selected to argue each side.
Do you think one side is right and one is wrong? Based on your experience, do you disagree with the information in your textbook or other course materials? What is the rationale for your position?
"Free speech is intended to protect the
controversial and even outrageous word; and not just comforting
platitudes too mundane to need protection." |
|
Front stage is what is visible to an audience, whereas the back stage includes all that is not visible to an audience. The back stage is where people behave in ways that might undermine their front stage performances.
To fully appreciate how social interaction works as drama, we must recognize both the front stage and the back stage of the theater.

Communicators know how to keep backstage behaviors out of view of the audience so they don't invalidate the front stage performance.
Knowing there is a backstage where we can let our hair down and relax helps us tolerate the sometimes stressful front stage work we do.
|
Change Your Perception
TRY IT OUT p. 122. Predict what would happen in your interpersonal communication if your backstage behaviors were observed by your audience.
Perception is highly individualized. See if you can put yourself in another person's place. Find a totally new way to think about or describe this idea. Can you create a different perception?
|
|
|
Agree or Disagree?
Dramaturgical Theory lacks validity regarding interpersonal communication because it is
Communication theories and theorists vary widely in their findings and the assumptions they make about human nature, knowledge, communication, and the goals of the theory. See Wood, J. T. (2004). Communication theories in action: An introduction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
"Here's to the crazy ones, the misfits, the
rebels, the troublemakers, the round pegs in the square holes... the
ones who see things differently -- they're not fond of rules... You can
quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them, but the only
thing you can't do is ignore them because they change things... they
push the human race forward, and while some may see them as the crazy
ones, we see genius, because the ones who are crazy enough to think that they can change the world, are the ones who do." |
|
Performance Ethnography (Conquergood)
Cultural performances are an intimate, universal aspect of human experiences; thus, studying them gives us insight into cultural life.
Ethnography is a method of interpreting actions in a manner that generates understanding in the terms of those performing the actions.
Geertz describes thick description as giving a fuller account by working to understand the meanings of activities from the perspective of those engaged in them.
|
Compare and Contrast
Thin description is similar to brute facts, whereas thick description is more like institutional facts.
Compare: In what ways are the two ideas, concepts, or theories similar? What is comparable, parallel, equivalent, analogous? Contrast: In what ways are the two ideas, concepts, or theories different? What is distinctive, a dissimilarity, unlike the other concept?
"All perception of truth is the detection of an analogy." |
|
Glassie insists that "ethnography is interaction, collaboration."
Conquergood explains that in ethnography, "instead of speaking about them, one speaks to and with them."

Direct, Bodily Experience
Participant-observation is a distinctive method of ethnography. By being not only an observer but also an active participant in a culture and sometimes even an activist on behalf of that culture.
Hermeneutic circle consists of near-experience and distance experience concepts and meanings. Distance experience meanings have meaning to people outside of that particular culture or social community.

Personal Narrative
Some performance studies scholars are interested in understanding and performing personal and oral histories, including ones told by regular people in everyday contexts about ordinary events.
|
Tell a Story Tell a story from your experience, or relay a story you've heard or read. Use the story as a case study to make sense of the course content as it relates to interpersonal communication.
(o. 128)
Wood, J. T.
(2004). Communication theories in action: An introduction.
Belmont,
CA:
Wadsworth. |
|
Personal narratives entail testimony which consists of statements based on personal experience about what someone, some activity, or something is, did, believes, feels like, or means.

|
Agree or Disagree?
Arthur Frank (1995) said that "listening is hard, but it is also a
fundamental moral act." Communication theories and theorists vary widely in their findings and the assumptions they make about human nature, knowledge, communication, and the goals of the theory. See Wood, J. T. (2004). Communication theories in action: An introduction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
"Here's to the crazy ones, the misfits, the
rebels, the troublemakers, the round pegs in the square holes... the
ones who see things differently -- they're not fond of rules... You can
quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them, but the only
thing you can't do is ignore them because they change things... they
push the human race forward, and while some may see them as the crazy
ones, we see genius, because the ones who are crazy enough to think that they can change the world, are the ones who do." |
|
|
Mini Speech Prepare an oral presentation on the following topic. One or more students may be selected to present OR one student from each group may be asked to present. If we run out of time before everyone can present orally, there will be opportunities to do other mini-speeches later in the term
"Frank (1995) notes that the core morality of personal narratives is a dual responsibility to self and others. . . when the teller of a story and the listener accept this responsibility, each has the potential to enter the other's life and to be changed by the entry" (p. 129).
"The human brain starts working the moment you are born and never stops until you stand up to speak in public." |
|
|
Change Your Perception Perception is highly individualized. See if you can put yourself in another person's place. Find a totally new way to think about or describe this idea. Can you create a different perception?
See Try It Out, p. 129 Talk with a person who is very different from you. Write a one-page identity statement.
|
|
|
Knowledge Checklist Consider this list of concepts. Imagine that you have a test where you have to write a paragraph about each item. You need to do the following: (a.) define
the concept in your own words, How many do you know?
Misuse of ethnography. Performance as political action. Gender comes into being only as it is performed. Without social conventions that prescribe masculinity and femininity, we could not perform gender. Gender reflects a reiteration of a norm. |
|
|
Agree or Disagree? "If you say a word enough, it becomes you" (p. 136).
Communication theories and theorists vary widely in their findings and the assumptions they make about human nature, knowledge, communication, and the goals of the theory. See Wood, J. T. (2004). Communication theories in action: An introduction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
"Here's to the crazy ones, the misfits, the
rebels, the troublemakers, the round pegs in the square holes... the
ones who see things differently -- they're not fond of rules... You can
quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them, but the only
thing you can't do is ignore them because they change things... they
push the human race forward, and while some may see them as the crazy
ones, we see genius, because the ones who are crazy enough to think that they can change the world, are the ones who do." |
|
|
Review chapter 6 |
Explain in your own words or give a personal example! |
|
back stage |
In dramaturgy, behaviors and appearances that are not visible to audiences (or others in an interactional situation). |
|
dramaturgical model |
The view of everyday life in which social interaction is performance, settings of interaction are stages, people are actors, and viewers are audiences. |
|
dramaturgy |
In communication theory, a theory that describes, explains, and predicts human behavior in terms of dramatic actions and settings. Also called dramaturgical theory. |
|
ethnography |
A qualitative method of research that interprets actions so as to generate understanding consistent with the frameworks of those who perform the actions. |
|
frame |
In dramaturgy, the ways people define situations for themselves and others. |
|
front stage |
In dramaturgy, behaviors and appearances that are visible to audiences (or others in an interactional situation). |
|
hermeneutic circle |
A process that consists of (1) meanings of behaviors and practices that reflect the understandings of those who are behaving, (2) meanings that are removed from the actors but represent the understandings of someone studying or viewing actors, and (3) translating the former into terms understandable in the vocabularies and experiences of the latter. Ethnographers move within the hermeneutic circle as they try to understand and represent practices that initially are unfamiliar to them. |
|
impression management |
In Goffman's dramaturgical theory, the process of managing settings, words, nonverbal communication, dress, and appearance in an effort to give others a specific view of oneself. |
|
narrative |
Telling a story about experience, identity, and so forth. Narratives are not necessarily objective representations or re-creations of experiences and identities. |
|
participant-observation |
A method often used in ethnographic research, in which the researcher-observer is also a participant in the situation being studied. |
|
performance ethnography |
A presentation that is based on intimate acquaintance with and understanding of people and experiences in a specific culture or social community and that seeks to make those people and experiences knowable to audiences who are not part of the indigenous groups. |
|
performativity |
The extent to which performance realizes (or makes real) identities and experiences. It is both the doing (the act of performing) and what is done (the reiteration or challenging of social norms in performance). |
|
personal story |
An account that announces how people see themselves and how they wish to be seen by others in an organization. |
|
testimony |
A statement based on personal experience about some action, experience, person, event, or other phenomenon. |
|
thick description |
An ethnographic method that describes cultural practices from the point of view of people who are members of the particular culture or social community being studied. |
Case 6 Thought and
Reflection
What was it about John’s behavior that made Susan so uncomfortable?
Have you ever had a situation where you still felt like "you" on the inside, but others began treating you differently? How did this affect your self-image?
Imagine six months from now. How will Susan and John interact together? What factors might affect the future of this relationship? Imagine a year from now. Do you think John will be "back to normal" with his other family members and friends?
Put yourself in Susan’s position. How would you interact with your friends when John is around? Put yourself in John’s position. Are there ways you can communicate the changes in your life without causing your family or friend discomfort? If so, how? Can discomfort ever be positive in a relation
Have you ever taken a position or held a belief that put you at odds with the majority of your peers? If so, how did you handle it? How did they react?
What were the turning points in John’s relationships with his family? His friends? What types of turning points could occur that would strengthen or weaken his current relationships?
|
Week 7 LEARNING OUTCOME: (a) Illustrate how verbal and nonverbal communication affect relationships. (b) Apply theories of rules and constructivism to communication in blended families and communication about sex and marriage.
Relationship Rules http://www.expertvillage.com/video/127860_rules-of-relationships.htm Constructivist Learning http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F00R3pOXzuk Vgotsky http://www.metacafe.com/watch/yt-A_205mQSLcA/the_true_history_of_vygotskian_social_constructivism/
Premarital sex (MSNBC) http://video.msn.com/video.aspx?mkt=en-us&vid=a3951d6a-bb36-4df3-a364-f9f25750f0e0
|
|
Chapter 7 Lecture Theories About How People Construct Meaning |
Rules theory and constructivism extend the premises of symbolic interactionism by providing more detailed accounts of how individuals construct meanings.
Rules Theory is the Coordinated Management of Meaning
Rules theory is concerned with how humans construct meaning for their communication.
Coordinated management of meaning (COMM.): We use communication rules to coordinate meanings in interaction with others.

CMM is an interpretive theory that assumes human communication is rule guided and rule following.
Hierarchy of Meanings
Pearce and Cronen believe that we rely on a hierarchy of meanings to interpret experiences. The hierarchy consists of multiple levels of meaning, and each level is contextualized by higher levels in the hierarchy.
|
Knowledge Checklist Consider this list of concepts. Imagine that you have a test where you have to write a paragraph about each item. You need to do the following: (a.) define
the concept in your own words, How many do you know?
|
|
|
Coffee and Conversation
Try it Out p. 145
Discuss an interpersonal communication story and apply the questions.
1. What did you regard as the content? 2. How did you define the speech act? 3. What did you consider the episode? 4. How did you perceive the relationship? 5. How do you describe your autobiography? 6. What cultural patterns can you identify that influenced this specific communication? In pairs, discuss an example, anecdote, story, or case study. Discuss what you know and what you think with another person in the class.
"Saying what we think gives us a wider conversational range than saying
what we know." |
|
Rules allow us to make sense of social interaction and guide our own communication so that we coordinate meanings with others.
|
Write About This! When you finish, you may want to talk to person sitting next to you about what you wrote. Please submit what you wrote to me at the end of class.
WRITE TWO RULES FOR EACH ROLE: 1. Constitutive rules define what counts as what for example, what counts as support, meanness, joking, praise). 2. Regulative rules guide interaction. In CMM theory, a rule that tells us when it's appropriate to do a certain thing and what we should do next in an interaction.
"The opposite of a correct statement is a
false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be
another profound truth."
|
|
Logical force describes the felt obligation to act.
Sometimes we feel we must do something because of prior actions, such as promises we've made.
|
Question!?!?
Is CMM a valid theory you can use in your everyday interpersonal communication?
Talk about it with the person next to you or team members in your group. What do you think?!?! Come up with one collaborative answer and write it down. Make sure the person who write the collaborative answer is NOT the person who served as recorder in the last session. The recorder will select the person to report the answer to the whole class.
"I respect faith, but doubt is what gets you
an education." |
Constructivism (Kelly) focuses on cognitive processes that we use to create meaning.
|
Compare and Contrast
DO p. 152 INDIVIDUALLY THINK AND WRITE. Complete the Role Category Questionnaire. (approximately 10 minutes)
Compare: In what ways are the two ideas, concepts, or theories similar? What is comparable, parallel, equivalent, analogous? Contrast: In what ways are the two ideas, concepts, or theories different? What is distinctive, a dissimilarity, unlike the other concept?
"All perception of truth is the detection of an analogy." |
|
Cognitive schema--knowledge structure.

Prototypes are the broadest cognitive structures, ideal, or optimal examples of categories of people, situations, objects.
Personal constructs--the second-broadest knowledge structures are building blocks. Examples would be intelligent-unintelligent, uninteresting-interesting.
Stereotypes are predictive generalizations about how a person will behave.
|
Compare and Contrast
Scripts are guides to action, much like the episodes that we read about in CMM.
Compare: In what ways are the two ideas, concepts, or theories similar? What is comparable, parallel, equivalent, analogous? Contrast: In what ways are the two ideas, concepts, or theories different? What is distinctive, a dissimilarity, unlike the other concept?
"All perception of truth is the detection of an analogy." |
|
|
Complete Try It Out on page 155. Think about a relatively common interpersonal communication activity in your everyday life. Answer the following questions.
What prototypes do you apply in interpreting the activity and other people? What personal constructs are salient in your thinking about the other people? What stereotypes do you make about how specific others will act? What is the basis of your predictive generalizations? What script do you follow in this activity? Has your script ever not worked? What happened?
As an active group member, complete this learning activity collaborating with other students in the class. Each student needs to be actively engaged and carry his or her share of the work responsibility. Write a summary: One person needs to record the group's decision on paper--please use blue or black ink--but the recorder CANNOT be the same person who was the recorder during the last group activity.
Responsibilities in a Small Group*
Be committed
to the group’s goals
Fulfill
individual assignments
Avoid
interpersonal conflicts
Encourage
full participation
Keep the
discussion on track *Lucas, S. E. (2004). The art of public speaking. (8th ed.) Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. |
|
Cognitive Complexity
Personal constructs are the centerpiece of constructivist theory building.
Constructivists believe that people vary in the complexity, or sophistication, of their interpretive processes.
Differentiation is measured by the number of distinct interpretations an individual uses to perceive and describe others.
Abstraction is the extent to which a person interprets others in terms of internal motives, personality traits, and character.
Organization is the degree to which a person notices and is able to make sense of contradictory behaviors.
Person-centered --cognitively complex people are more capable of engaging in sensitive communication that is tailored to particular others.
The research inspired by constructivist theory is impressive and growing

|
Mini Speech Prepare an oral presentation on the following topic.
Constructivist Theory lacks internal validity, has weak utility, and neglects communication.
One or more students may be selected to present OR one student from each group may be asked to present. If we run out of time before everyone can present orally, there will be opportunities to do other mini-speeches later in the term.
"The human brain starts working the moment you are born and never stops until you stand up to speak in public." |
|
|
Review chapter 7 |
Explain in your own words or give a personal example! |
|
abstraction |
One of three measures of cognitive complexity; the extent to which an individual interprets others in terms of internal motives, personality traits, and character as opposed to more concrete factors such as actions, physical appearance, and so forth. |
|
autobiography |
One of six levels in the hierarchy of meanings; an individual's view of himself or herself that both shapes communication and is shaped by communication. |
|
cognitive complexity |
In constructivist theory, the degree to which an individual's interpretive processes are differentiated, abstract, and organized. |
|
cognitive schema (pl. schemata) |
A knowledge structure on which individuals rely to interpret experience and construct meanings. There are four types of cognitive schemata: prototypes, personal constructs, stereotypes, and scripts. |
|
constitutive rule |
In CMM theory, a rule that defines what counts as what in communication (for example, what counts as support, meanness, joking, praise). |
|
constructivism |
The point of view that humans create meanings by relying on four basic cognitive schemata, or knowledge structures. There are four types of cognitive schemata: prototypes, personal constructs, stereotypes, and scripts. |
|
content |
One of six levels in the hierarchy of meanings; the denotative or literal meanings of words in communication. |
|
coordinated management of meanings (CMM) |
See rules theory. |
|
cultural pattern |
One of six levels in the hierarchy of meanings; understandings of speech acts, episodes, relationships, and autobiographies that are shared by some groups and some societies. |
|
differentiation |
One of three measures of cognitive complexity; the number of distinct interpretations (constructs) an individual uses to perceive and describe others. More cognitively complex individuals use more constructs to interpret others than do less cognitively complex individuals. |
|
episode |
One of six levels in the hierarchy of meaning; a recurring routine of interaction that is structured by rules and has boundaries. |
|
hierarchy of meanings |
In rules theory (coordinated management of meaning), the multiple levels of meaning, each contextualized by higher levels. We rely on the hierarchy of meanings to interpret communication. |
|
logical force |
In CMM theory, the degree to which a person feels he or she must act or cannot act in a situation. |
|
organization |
One of three dimensions of cognitive complexity; the extent to which a person notices and is able to make sense of contradictory behaviors. |
|
person-centeredness |
The ability to tailor communication to particular individuals with whom we interact. Individuals who are highly complex cognitively seem capable of more person-centered communication than do less cognitively complex individuals. |
|
personal construct |
One of four cognitive schemata used to interpret experience; a bipolar scale of description (for example, happy-unhappy). |
|
prototype |
One of four cognitive schemata; an ideal or optimal example of a category of person, situation, object, and so on. |
|
regulative rule |
In CMM theory, a rule that tells us when it's appropriate to do a certain thing and what we should do next in an interaction. |
|
relationship |
In rules theory, one of six levels in the hierarchy of meanings; a scripted form of interaction that we engage in with a particular other. |
|
rule |
Regularity in behavior that is consistent within a particular situation or situations but is not assumed to be universal. Rules are guides for behavior, not determinants of it. |
|
rules theory |
The point of view that socially constructed and learned rules guide communication. Also called coordinated management of meaning (CMM) theory. |
|
script |
One of four cognitive schemata; a routine, or action sequence, that reflects our understanding of how a particular interaction is supposed to proceed. |
|
speech act |
In rules theory, one of six levels in the hierarchy of meaning; an action that is performed by speaking (for example, pleading, joking, apologizing, inviting). |
|
stereotype |
One of four cognitive schemata; a predictive generalization about a person's behavior that is based on general knowledge about the group to which we classify the person as belonging. |
|
strange loop |
In CMM theory, an internal conversation (intrapersonal communication) by means of which the individual is trapped in a destructive pattern of thinking and/or acting. |
Case 11 Thought and Reflection
What makes a group of people a "real family"? In your view, which of the groups in this case study are "real families"? Why so?
A theoretical perspective known as relational dialectics claims that relationships are organized around opposing tensions, or pulls in opposite directions. What simultaneous dialectical tensions or pulls can you identify in Lonnie’s account of the development of her blended families?
What are the major turning points, significant points of positive or negative change, in the development of Lonnie’s blended families?
Lonnie’s blended family with Gail and Tim developed differently from he blended family with Gene and Victoria. What factors contribute to the different developmental paths these two blended families experienced?
Rituals are recurring interaction events, formalized or informal, that hold importance to their participants. What rituals can you identify in this case study? How did rituals change as Lonnie’s families changed? Why were some rituals able to adapt to new circumstances while other rituals were not?
Case 12 Thought and Reflection
Based on what you’ve learned about their relationship, how would you characterize Rich and Sarah’s relationship and their communication? What is likely to happen when Rich goes back to talk to Sarah? Model how the conversation might go.
Do you think Shawn is a man or a woman? Why?
How open and honest are Sarah, Amanda, and Micki with one other?
What concerns do people have when talking about or negotiating sexual limits? What other ways might couples have the initial discussion about safer sex? How do/can people talk about sex when they don’t know each other very well?
How are Rich and Sarah’s discussions shaped by Sarah’s disclosures?
Are there questions you have about HIV/AIDS/STDs or contraception? What resources can you identify on your campus or in your area to answer these questions?

|
Week 8
LEARNING OUTCOME: Compare and contrast theories about interpersonal dynamics. Talk about upcoming core assessment paper (media influence on interpersonal communication).
Links to Handouts (Note Template): http://onlineacademics.org/CA301/Handouts/ Content Analysis Articles: http://onlineacademics.org/CA301/Private/ Fine Art Analysis: Paintings about Relationships Key principles of chapter 8: Theories about interpersonal dynamics. Create a Mobile Touch Avoidance Measure |
1. ANTICIPATORY SET
Fine Art Analysis: What does this painting say about interpersonal communication?

Friends, Mariana Barnes
http://www.fineartbymariana.com/show-image/384504/Mariana-Barnes,-PhD/Friends.jpg
"The symbolic patchwork Quilt-like paintings convey movement through the vibrant colors energizing the various dynamic patterns."
2. LEARNING OUTCOME: Compare and contrast theories about interpersonal dynamics.
galleryofart.files.wordpress.com

http://fineartamerica.com/images-medium/honeymoon-sunil-mehta.jpg
Honeymoon Painting by Sunil Mehta
Couple to Be -- Wolfgang Karl
http://fineartamerica.com/watermark.html?id=305516

The Lovers, Rene Magritte http://www.demandmore.org/images/lovers%20-%20magritte.jpg
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group 1 |
Group 2 |
Group 3 |
Group 4 |
|
Honeymoon Painting, Sunil Mehta |
Couple to Be, Wolfgang Karl |
The Lovers, Rene Magritte |
|
3. Input
Chapter 8 Lecture: Theories About Interpersonal Dynamics |
|

Watzlawick, Beavin, and Jackson proposed interactional AKA pragmatic theory.
Consider how your perception and processing may affect the way you communicate interpersonally.
Look at the dancer: http://www.news.com.au/perthnow/story/0,21598,22492511-5005375,00.html
Contexts originated with von Bertalanffy, who pioneered the idea under the name of general systems theory.
Systems Theory
All life forms, social as well as biological, can be understood only as complex, organized wholes called systems.
All parts are interrelated.
Systems are organized wholes.
The whole is more than the sum of its parts. For example, the family is more than each indvidual alone. Openness is the extent to which a system affects and is affected by factors and processes outside of it. Most human relationships are fairly open.
Systems strive for, but never achieve, equilibrium. Absolute balance isn't possible for living systems.
|
Create a Mobile
All life forms, social as well as biological, can be understood only as complex, organized wholes called systems.
|
|
Levels of Meaning
We are always communicating (one cannot not communicate).
1. Content meaning is basic.
2. Relationship meaning is about the relationship between people. Beck calls the relationship level of communication "hidden meanings." Hidden meanings are very powerful aspects of relationshi systems because they express and sustain the emotional climate between people.
3. Metacommunication is communication about the communication (commentary on the content level).
Punctuation is the way communication episodes start and stop. Communication tends to go smoothly as long as all parties agree on punctuation.
Communication and Power
All communication is either symmetrical (reflects equal power) or
complementary (reflects different levels of power).
The Palo Alto group worked with troubled families, where power comes in many forms (passive-aggression, games, manipulation, and is often central and continuous in family interaction.
Parallel relationships are those in which power is equal overall but distributed so that each individual has primary authority or control in certain realms.
Critical assessment of interactional theory:
Theory is not testable.
Theory overemphasizes power between communicators.
Theory ignores intent.
Dialectical tensions:
Integration versus Separation
Stability versus Change
Expression versus Privacy
|
Dialectical Theory (Baxter and Rawlins)
Dialectics are contradictory or opposing tensions. There can be periods in which the contradictory impulses of dialectics do NOT generate tension.
Contradiction is conflict, opposition, contrast, or discrepancy between two things.
Process is that change always exists and moves the relationship forward.
Integration versus Separation Stability versus Change Expression versus Privacy
Our Response
|
DIALECTICAL TENSION
|
5. Check for Understanding
![]()
|
Quiz: Wood, Communication Theories in Action - An Introduction 3e, Chapter 8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]()
Additional Learning Activities
|
Try It Out p. 168
Pair up according to a television drama or comedy. Both of you have to know the show.
Title: Activity 2
Instructions: Try the following exercise after reviewing Chapter 8. a. Concentrate on a single relationship in a program that airs at least weekly. b. Analyze the metacommunication. c. What is expressed and negotiated in terms of affection, respect, and power between the characters.
You can perform the same
analysis on communication in your own life by focusing on the
relationship level of meaning in interaction. |
|
|
TALK or write for five minutes Julia Wood seems to particularly value Dialectical Theory. In fact, she wrote a book on interpersonal communication, which weaves this theory throughout the book. As a pair or group, discuss Dialectical Theory.
"The opposite of a correct statement is a
false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be
another profound truth."
|
DIALECTICAL TENSION
PUSH - PULL |
|
Review Chapter 8 |
Explain in your own words or give a personal example! |
|
complementary |
In interactional theory, of or pertaining to a form of communication and a type of relationship in which power is unequal between individuals. |
|
content meaning |
One of two levels of meaning identified by interactional theorists; the literal significance, or denotative meaning, of communication. |
|
dialectical moments |
In dialectical theory, momentary periods of equilibrium between opposing dialectics in the larger pattern of continuous change that marks relationships. |
|
dialectical theory |
The point of view that certain tensions between contradictory desires are inherent in personal relationships. |
|
dialectics |
In dialectical theory, points of contradiction that cause tension and impel change in relationships. Three relational dialectics have been identified: autonomy -connection, openness-closedness, and novelty-routine. |
|
general systems theory |
Theory originated by Ludwig von Bertalanffy, which claims that all living organisms are dynamic wholes that function as a result of organized interaction among parts. |
|
homeostasis |
A steady state; equilibrium; balance. General systems theory claims that living systems (relationships, for example) strive for, but never fully sustain, homeostasis. Dialectical theory, on the other hand, claims that continuous change is the very nature of relationships. |
|
interactional theory |
A theory built on the premise that communication and relationships are systems in which meaning is established through contexts, punctuation, and content and relationship levels of meaning. |
|
metacommunication |
Communication about communication. |
|
neutralization |
In dialectical theory, the method of responding to the tension of relational dialectics by means of a compromise that meets both dialectical needs to a degree but satisfies neither need fully. |
|
openness |
In general systems theory, the extent to which a system affects and is affected by factors and processes outside of it. Living systems may be more or less open to outside influence and more or less influential on their contexts. |
|
parallel relationships |
In interactional theory, relationships in which individuals have equal power overall but power is distributed so that each person has greater power in particular spheres of activity. |
|
process |
The quality of being ongoing, in flux, ever changing. Communication is a process. |
|
punctuation |
In interactional theory, subjective designations of the start and stop of particular communication episodes. |
|
reframing |
In dialectical theory, a method of managing relational dialectics that involves transforming the perception of dialectical needs as opposing, and reframing them as unified, complementary, or otherwise allied. |
|
relationship meaning |
In interactional theory, one of two levels of meaning in communication; what communication reflects about feelings and relationships between people. Relationship-level meanings may express liking, power, and/or responsiveness. |
|
selection |
In dialectical theory, one means of managing relational dialectics that involves satisfying one need in a dialectic and ignoring or denying the contradictory one. |
|
separation |
In dialectical theory, one means of managing relational dialectics that attempts to meet both contradictory needs in a dialectic by satisfying each one in separate situations or spheres of relational life. |
|
symmetrical |
In interactional theory, of or pertaining to a form of communication and relationships in which power is equal between partners. |
Case 7 Thought and Reflection
According to Baxter (1988) there are at least three dialectical tensions inherent in all relationships:
autonomy/connection,
novelty/predictability, and
openness/closedness.
Identify the dialectical tensions apparent in Jennifer and Ashley’s relationship. Can you find specific examples of each of the dialectical tensions in the relationship? Which dialectical tension is most predominant in Jennifer and Ashley’s relationship?

Relationship partners, knowingly or unknowingly, use strategies to deal with the dialectical tensions in their relationship. What are the strategies researchers have identified for managing dialectical tensions (Baxter, 1988, Baxter-Montgomery, 1998; Wood, 1995, 1997). Which of these strategies did Jennifer and Ashley use to manage the dialectical tensions in their relationship? Which dialectical tensions did these strategies address? What was the principle dialectical strategy used to manage the openness/closedness dialectic in their relationship?
Dialectical tensions are often experienced in varying degrees of intensity and at different times by each partner in a relationship. Find specific examples of Jennifer and Ashley experiencing the tensions to different degrees or at different times in their relationship. How did their different experiences of the dialectical tensions lead to conflict in their relationship?
How relationship partners respond to dialectical tensions influences relationship development. How did Jennifer and Ashley’s relationship develop (decline) and change as a result of their responses to the dialectical tensions? What dialectical tension did you feel was most important for Ashley and Jennifer to be able to maintain their relationship? What strategies were most effective in maintaining Jennifer and Ashley’s relationship?
Dialectical tensions are interrelated in personal relationships. How does the autonomy/connection tension affect the openness/closedness tension, and vice versa, in Jennifer and Ashley’s relationship? How does the novelty/predictability tension affect the openness/closedness tension, and vice versa, in Jennifer and Ashley’s relationship?
|
Week 9
|
|
Chapter 9 Lecture
Theories about Communication and the Evolution of Relationships |
I Can Change
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLwZxIeJa_Y
------John
Legend
Hmm…
Snoop talking
Hey yo nephew check this out man
Now I know you got that bad chick right there
You aint even tripping off of her
But she doing all of that for you
She got this, she got that
She’s off the hizzle
I mean when you find one like that
You got to make that change man
Cuz they don’t come too often
And when they do come
You gotta be smart enough to know when to change
Like Sam Cooke say change gon’ come nephew
And you better believe that
As I look back on all that I've done to you
My biggest regrets
The things that I never could do
I see the light now baby it's shining through
Gotta give up the game
Yeah I got some changin’ to do
I won’t get high if you want it
Get that straight
9 to 5 if you want it
Keep my ass home at night if you want it wewe
Whatever you need me to do
When you talk I’ma listen
Give you all that attention you missing
Girl I swear I’ma handle my business
Just like a real man should do
I can change
I can change (you know I can change baby)
I can change
For you (you know I can stop baby)
I can change (you know I change baby)
I can change
I can change
For you (you know I can stop baby)
I’ll give up all the places I used to go
Stay out the club
Stay home because I’m with you
I’ll give up all those girls that I used to know
They don’t compare
Baby I swear it’s the truth (you know it’s the truth baby)
So I’m through with the women
Yeah that’s right
I give up on the pimpin’
Girl I’m gonna repent from my sinnin’
If that’s what you want me to do
I’ll get right if you want it
Go to church
Get baptized if you want it
Girl you opened my eyes and I’m gonna
Be much better for you
Baby believe me
Baby believe me
I can change (you know I can change baby)
I can change (know I can change baby)
I can change
For you
I can change
I can change
I can change
For you
Snoop’s Rap
Take me to the river
And baptize my soul
I’m so outta control
Needing someone to hold
Man it’s cold
I aint been clubbin’, drinkin’, or smokin’
I’m focused
Bowin’ down every night prayin’ and hopin’
I’m trying to figure out a way
But I just don’t know how to say
But I’m rearrangin’
Hopefully I’m changin’
And you can see that
Baby cuz it’s hard for me
Kinda sorta odd for me
But aint nothing to it
If you need me to do it
I guess…
I can change
I can change
I can change
For you (I’ll give up on the pimpin’ for you)
I can change
I can change
I can change
For you (sing it again y’all)
I can change
I can change
I can change
For you
I can change
I can change
I can change
For you
You know I can stop baby
Gotta believe me (you gotta believe me baby)
Gotta believe me (mmm yeah)
I telling the truth
You know I can stop baby
Gotta believe me (believe me)
Gotta believe me (believe me yeah)
I’m telling the truth
Get baptized if you want it
This time I mean it
Gotta believe me (this time I mean it)
Gotta believe me
I'm telling the truth
|
Coffee and Conversation
You find yourself refreshed
by the presence of cheerful people. Why not make an honest effort to
confer that pleasure on others? Half the battle is gained if you never
allow yourself to say anything gloomy.
|
|
I. Uncertainty reduction theory is a laws approach that includes axioms.
A. Uncertainty reduction theory relies on the belief that human behavior is predictable.
1. Laws-based explanations assume that human behavior is the result of invariant laws.
2. Laws-based explanations assume human behavior is determined by external stimuli.
B. Axioms are statements that are presumed to be true on face value and do not require proof.
1. Uncertainty reduction theory includes 7 axioms as its foundation.
Given the high level of uncertainty present at the onset of the entry phase of relations, as the amount of verbal communication between strangers increases, the level of uncertainty for each person in the relationship decreases. As uncertainty is further reduced, the amount of verbal communication increases.
As nonverbal affiliative expressiveness increases, uncertainty levels decrease in an initial interaction situation. In addition, decreases in uncertainty level cause increases in nonverbal affiliative expressiveness.
High levels of uncertainty cause increases in information-seeking behavior. As uncertainty levels decline, information-seeking behavior decreases.
High levels of uncertainty in a relationship cause decreases in the intimacy level of communication content. Low levels of uncertainty produce higher levels of intimacy.
High levels of uncertainty produce high rates of reciprocity in self-disclosing communication. Low levels of uncertainty produce low reciprocity rates.
Similarities between persons reduce uncertainty; dissimilarities produce increases in uncertainty.
Increases in uncertainty level produce decreases in liking. Decreases in uncertainty level produce increases in liking.
2. The most basic claim of the theory is that uncertainty is uncomfortable so people communicate to reduce uncertainty.
3. These same axioms also appear to apply to intercultural communication.
|
Agree
or Disagree? Some critics argue that uncertainty reduction theory is inappropriate for describing, explaining, and predicting human behavior. Explain the basis of this criticism, identify your position, and explain why you agree or disagree with the criticism.
|
|
II. There are two major criticisms of uncertainty reduction theory.

A. The theory is narrow in scope.
1. It focuses only on uncertainty, which is not the only influence on how relationships develop.
2. Other influences may be more important in the growth and decay of relationships.
B. The theory is invalid.
1. Critics assert that some of the basic axioms on which the theory rests are invalid.
2. If axioms are not true, then the laws derived from axioms are not reliable.
C. Proponents of uncertainty reduction theory admit that some of the theory's axioms are of dubious validity.
1. Proponents say the theory can be developed and refined to be valid.
2. Defenses of uncertainty reduction theory have been neither strong nor convincing.

|
Question!?!? Do you believe uncertainty can be eliminated in a relationship? Should it be eliminated? Provide specific examples to support your positions. Talk about it with the person next to you or team members in your group. What do you think?!?! Have one person act as the recorder, who will write notes and email them to everyone BEFORE the next class meeting. Make sure the person who write the collaborative answer is NOT the person who served as recorder in the last session. The recorder will select the person to report the answer to the whole class.
"I respect faith, but doubt is what gets you
an education." |
III. Social exchange theory is actually a group of theories that share three common assumptions.
A. Humans evaluate their relationships by making cost-benefit analyses designed to maximize individual profit.
1. We measure rewards, which are positively valued phenomena we get from being in relationships.
2. We measure costs, which are negatively valued phenomena we incur from being in relationships.
3. The net outcome (O) of a relationship is rewards minus costs: R - C.
B. We use standards of comparison to assess the meaning of net outcomes of relationships.
C. People prefer equitable relationships to inequitable relationships.
1. Equity concerns whether a relationship is fair over time.
2. Both feeling under-benefited and over-benefited in a relationship cause dissatisfaction and relational stress.
|
What is your ethical position? Research says this statement is false: In most (50%+) dual-worker families home chores and child care are shared equally by both adult partners.
|
|
3. Equity in terms of housework and caregiving is of primary importance in most dual-worker families.
|
|
Apply Research Findings Can you think of an example or story from your personal experience that describes this theory? Define social exchange theory and its central claims. Next, discuss the primary criticisms of exchange theory that have been made by scholars. Finally, offer your personal experiences relevant to this theory.
"Research findings are reviewed by others
through analytical processes. They are the closest thing we have
to the truth." |
IV. There are four major criticisms of social exchange theories.
A. The theory has little heuristic value.
B. The theory is not testable.
C. The theory is inappropriate for humans and human relationships.
D. Research fails to confirm some of the key claims of social exchange theories.

V. Developmental theories focus on how relationships develop, grow, and decline over time.
A. First generation developmental theories had serious limitations.
1. They were excessively and inappropriately linear.
2. They implied an inevitability to relational development.
3. They did not include, nor apply to, a number of intimate relationships, such as gay and lesbian commitments.
4. They focused on external, observable phenomena to define stages in relational life.
B. Second generation developmental models are more sophisticated and useful. James Honeycutt emphasized that relationships develop not because of events themselves, but because of how we interpret events.

C. Individual have "imagined trajectories," which are their understandings and expectations of the typical paths relationships follow.
1. They are a type of knowledge schemata that guides how we think about what is happening between us and others.
2. Relationships may also have turning points, which exist when we interpret certain relational events or moments as significant in changing the direction or nature of a relationship.
VI. Second generation developmental theories have not been seriously criticized.
|
|
Five Minute Write
Spend five minutes writing about what you learned so far in class today. You have to write constantly and cannot stop for five minutes. If you cannot think of anything to write, write "I cannot think of anything" until something comes to mind. Often, students will just write about the last idea discussed. Write about the session from beginning to end. You may want to revise and add your writing to your electronic course portfolio.
"It is not a bad idea to get in the habit of writing down one's
thoughts. It saves one having to bother anyone else with them." |
|
Review Chapter 9 |
Explain in your own words or give a personal example! |
|
axiom |
A statement that is presumed to be true on its face and therefore does not require proof or explanation. |
|
comparison level (CL) |
In social exchange theory, a subjective standard of what we expect in a particular type of relationship such as friendship or romance. |
|
comparison level of alternatives (CLalt) |
In social exchange theory, a relative measure that evaluates how good a particular relationship is in comparison to real or perceived alternatives to that relationship. |
|
cost |
In social exchange theory, anything that has negative value to an individual. |
|
developmental theory |
The point of view that relationships evolve through stages defined by participants' expectations, perceptions, and meanings. |
|
equity |
In social exchange theory, the fairness of a relationship to individuals over time. |
|
intercultural communication |
The branch of communication field that studies communication among people from different cultures, including distinct cultures within a single country. |
|
reward |
In social exchange theory, anything that has positive value for an individual. |
|
social exchange theory |
The point of view that in relationships people try to minimize costs, maximize rewards, and ensure equity. |
|
social penetration model |
One of the first-generation theories of relational development; likens the development of personal relationships to peeling the layers of an onion to move progressively toward the center or core self. |
|
trajectory |
A personal understanding of various tracks in relationships. Trajectories define relational courses based on past experiences and observations. |
|
turning point |
A critical event, process, or feeling that individuals perceive as marking a new direction or intensity in a personal relationship. |
|
uncertainty reduction theory |
The point of view that uncertainty motivates communication and that certainty reduces the motivation to communicate. |
Case 13 Thought and Reflection
Why is privacy so important in marriage? What is the relationship between privacy and disclosure? What is the difference between remaining private and lying?
Matt and Jennifer grew up with different privacy expectations. How are their expectations different, and how did this difference influence their new marriage?
Jennifer and Matt talk about privacy rules. What are the rules according to Communication Boundary Theory of private disclosures? How are the rules changing for this couple?
Why does Jennifer feel embarrassed? Would you? Why?
Many newly married couples do not talk about the expectations they have for privacy and disclosure. Privacy rules are often assumptions people make without confirming another’s point of view. Beside the points raised in this case study, in what other way might Matt and Jennifer have privacy conflicts in the future?

Additional thoughts about Case 13?
Why is privacy so important in marriage? What is the relationship between privacy and disclosure? What is the difference between remaining private and lying?
Matt and Jennifer grew up with different privacy expectations. How are their expectations different, and how did this difference influence their new marriage?
Jennifer and Matt talk about privacy rules. What are the rules according to Communication Boundary Theory of private disclosures? How are the rules changing for this couple?
Why does Jennifer feel embarrassed? Would you? Why?
Many newly married couples do not talk about the expectations they have for privacy and disclosure. Privacy rules are often assumptions people make without confirming another’s point of view. Beside the points raised in this case study, in what other way might Matt and Jennifer have privacy conflicts in the future?
Collaborative Teamwork for Portfolio!
As an active group member, complete this learning activity collaborating with
other students in the class. Each student needs to be actively
engaged and carry his or her share of the work responsibility.
Based on a case study,
explain the following.
Analyze
stages/elements of communication concepts
Identify motives of the communication
Identify causes of the communication
Identify effects of the communication.
Week 10 Agenda
Create a model of relational development and dissolution.
Evaluate
different communication strategies for relational maintenance and
repair.
Bringing Theorists to the Table Assignment: Make a
menu and place service for your assigned theorist. Present the
basic principles and beliefs of the theorist by speaking as if you
are the theorist. Roleplay. Have you ever seen one
of Oprah's book dinners? In this case several theorists--those
in your group--will come to the table with the rest of us.
You'll tell us about what you think, and we'll ask questions.
Each person in the group should have questions to ask other
theorists in the group to keep the presentation lively. Real
food and drink is a good way to enhance the roleplaying. An inspiration for the assignment.
Judy Chicago's The Dinner Party,
1976
David Berlo: Model of
communication My place setting is for David K.
Berlo. He was my thesis advisor at Michigan State, and I think of his
inspirational words often My name is Dave Berlo. I'm a
professor of communication and writer. My place setting is simple and
small because I want to conserve ideas by focusing on the essence of
communication. My model of communication is what made me famous, in my book the
Process of Communication. I like the color green because it represents
recycling, and I recycled earlier ideas about models. For dinner I'm eating and
drinking golden beads, which represent the golden nuggets of my theories. Sign up for the theorist you will be.
Visual aid needs to include place setting and menu. Make sure you focus on
how the ideas relate to interpersonal communication. Steve Duck: Relationships
http://family.jrank.org/pages/1354/Relationship-Dissolution-Duck-s-Model.html Julia T. Wood: Textbook
author. Intimate
partner violence, gendered
dynamics in culture. B. F. Skinner: Behaviorism
http://www.bfskinner.org/BFSkinner/Home.html John Searle: Speech acts
http://www.csus.edu/indiv/n/nogalesp/Phil176SPG06/AustinSearle/SearleWhatIsASpeechActSummary.doc Victoria DeFrancisco:
Conversations between spouses George Herbert Mead:
Symbolic activity
http://www.bolenderinitiatives.com/sociology/george-herbert-mead-1863-1931 Aaron Beck: Couples,
relationship level of communication
http://hubpages.com/hub/Gender-Communication Herbert Blumer: Individuals
construct their actions
http://www.jstor.org/pss/4121334 Kenneth Burke: Dramatism
http://rhetorica.net/burke.htm B. Aubrey Fisher: Narrative Erving Goffman:
Dramaturgical model (The World's a Stage)
http://www.csulb.edu/~hmarlowe/SOC335/Goffman_Dramaturgical_Model.pdf Marshall McLuhan:
Technological determinism
http://oak.cats.ohiou.edu/~kh380597/TD.htm -
http://www.colorado.edu/communication/meta-discourses/Theory/mcluhan/index.htm George Gerber: Media
cultivation theory
http://www.uky.edu/~drlane/capstone/mass/cultivation.htm Sandra Harding: Standpoint
theory
http://www.afirstlook.com/main.cfm/theory_resources/Standpoint_Theory James Honeycutt:
Relationship perception
http://www.jstor.org/pss/352051 Leslie A. Baxter:
Dialectical theory, Turning points in romantic relationships.
http://www.uky.edu/~drlane/capstone/interpersonal/reldial.htm William Gudykunst:
Intercultural communication
http://calstate.fullerton.edu/news/2005/116_gudykunst.html -
http://spot.colorado.edu/~mody/docs/Handbookof%20InternationalCommFM.pdf Yun Kim: Cultural
adaptation
http://www.ou.edu/deptcomm/facpages/kim.html William Rawlins:
Dialectical theory
http://www.sagepub.com/authorDetails.nav?contribId=622061 Albert Bandura: Social
learning theory
http://tip.psychology.org/bandura.html Paul Watzlawick:
Interactional theory (Pragmatics of Communication)
http://www.colorado.edu/communication/meta-discourses/Theory/watzlawick/ Ted Zorn: Constructivism
http://www.waikato.ac.nz/php/research.php?mode=show&author=74541 Brant Burleson: Comforting
communication
http://www.jstor.org/pss/1130086 Jesse Delia: Constructivism
http://www.uky.edu/~drlane/capstone/interpersonal/construct.html Barnett Pearce or
Vernon Cronen: Hierarchy
of meaninghttp://mattsmediaresearch.com/lecturenotes/CommTheoryCH7.ppt Ludwig von Bertalanffy:
General systems theory
http://www.panarchy.org/vonbertalanffy/systems.1968.html Mikhail Bakhtin:
Dialogue infuses human existence
http://www.isfp.co.uk/russian_thinkers/mikhail_bakhtin.html -
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3404100107.html Kathryn Dindia: Dialectical
theory
http://www4.uwm.edu/letsci/communication/faculty/dindia.cfm
Week 12
LEARNING
OUTCOME: Describe how mass communication theories may explain
interpersonal communication
Chapter
11 Lecture
Theories of Mass Communication Relevant to
Interpersonal Communication
Technological Determinism
claims that some single cause determines other aspects of life (McLuhan).
Expectation of
immediate answer, resolution, information. Less careful
checking of details. Hurried approach. Multitasking. Shortened attention
span.
Cultivation Theory
claims that technology--particularly television--has a cumulative effect in
shaping our view of reality. Children's sex-role
stereotypes seem directly related to the amount of commercial television
they watch. Television can make
people think more alike. Mean world syndrome:
The belief that the world is a dangerous place full of people who cannot be
trusted and who are likely to harm us. Media tend to
support and normalize established cultural practices and values.
Do media affect our
relationships? Do you sit and watch
television or play on the Internet instead of talk? Do you become bored with
people? Do you expect problems
to be resolved quickly? Do dialectical tensions
seem bad? Does conflict seem bad? Do we think rudeness is
appropriate because of what we see on television?
Knowledge Checklist
Consider this list of concepts.
Imagine that you have a test where you have to write a
paragraph about
a possible interpersonal
communication influence of each of these mass communication concepts.
How many do you know?
cool media
cultivation
cultivation theory
cultural
mainstream
determinism
electronic
epoch
hot media
literate
epoch
mainstreaming
mean world
syndrome
multitasking
print epoch
resonance
technological determinism
tribal
epoch
Debate!
Television and films have a strong influence on interpersonal
communication.
Televisions and films give people ideas about what to say and how to act in relationships.
versus
Television and films have no influence on interpersonal communication.
People behave as they were taught by family and friends who model
interpersonal relationships.
Review Chapter 11
Explain in your own words or give a personal example!
cool media
McLuhan's term for media that include incomplete sensory data and thus require human
involvement and participation.
cultivation
In cultivation theory, the
cumulative process by which television fosters beliefs about social reality, including the belief that the world is more
dangerous and violent than it actually is.
cultivation theory
The point of view that television promotes a view of social reality that may be
inaccurate but that viewers nonetheless assume reflects real
life.
cultural mainstream
In cultivation theory, the
general view of social life that television constructs.
determinism
The belief that human behavior
is governed by forces beyond individual control, usually
biology, environment, or a combination of the two.
electronic epoch
The fourth era in McLuhan's
media history of civilization, ushered in by the invention
of the telegraph, which made it possible for people to
communicate personally across distance.
hot media
McLuhan's term for media that include relatively complete sensory data and hence do not require significant human participation.
literate epoch
The second era in McLuhan's
media history of civilization, inaugurated by invention of
the phonetic alphabet and during which common symbols
allowed people to communicate in writing.
mainstreaming
In cultivation theory, the
effect of television in stabilizing and homogenizing views
within a society; one of two processes used to explain
television's cultivation of synthetic world views.
mass communication
Collective term for forms of
communication aimed at large audiences.
mean world syndrome
In cultivation theory, the
belief that the world is a dangerous place full of selfish,
mean people who cannot be trusted and who are likely to harm
others. Cultivation theorists assert that the mean world
syndrome is fostered by heavy viewing of television.
multitasking
Engaging in two or more
activities at once or in interacting, overlapping ways.
print epoch
The third era in McLuhan's media
history of civilization, in which invention of the printing
press made it possible to mass-produce written materials so
that reading was no longer restricted to elite members of
society.
resonance
In cultivation theory, the
extent to which something (specifically, phenomena on
television) is congruent with personal experience; one of
two mechanisms used to explain television's ability to
cultivate synthetic world views.
technological determinism
The point of view that media
decisively influence how individuals think, feel, and act,
as well as how they view collective life.
tribal epoch
The first era in McLuhan's media
history of civilization, during which the oral tradition
reigned and face- to-face talking and listening were primary
forms of communication.

"No one wants advice, only collaboration."
John Steinbeck (1902 - 1968)
LEARNING
OUTCOME:

Represented by John Natsoulas Gallery, Davis, CA
http://comm.unc.edu/facstaff/facultyprofile/wood/index_html

How
do media influence interpersonal communication?

FRIENDS Ross's Teeth -
Friends - scenes with the cheesecake
Case Studies About Relationships (from the Internet)

|
Week 11 Mar. 31-Apr 2
Read Case 15 and use collaborative teamwork to answer for your electronic portfolio. |
Case 15 Thought and Reflection
A theoretical perspective we've discussed is relational dialectics suggests that people have to manage opposing tensions or pulls in opposite directions in their relationships. What dialectical tensions or pulls do Ray and Shawna have to manage in their relationship with each other? In their relationships with their children? In other relationships?
Communication researchers argue that self-disclosure—revealing to others information about yourself that they would not otherwise know—is essential in developing close relationships. How does Shawna feel about the level of self-disclosure in her marriage at this time? When do Shawna and Ray self-disclose to each other? Does it always have a positive effect on their feelings for each other?

Compliance-gaining, or persuasion, occurs whenever we try to convince someone to believe as we do or do as we would like. Who engages in compliance-gaining in this case study? In how many different contexts does compliance-gaining occur? How frequently do the various characters engage in compliance-gaining?
The study of relational maintenance focuses on the communication and behaviors people use to stay together. What do Shawna and Ray do in order to remain close as a couple? What external factors are in place that help keep them together as a couple?
As Ray suggests, conflict is inevitable. What do Ray and Shawna have conflict over? What negative communication behaviors do they engage in? What positive behaviors do they use? Why do you think it took Ray longer to recover from their argument?
Do mediated communications have a dialectical push-pull.
|
Week 12
LEARNING OUTCOME: Describe how mass communication theories may explain interpersonal communication Read chapter 11
Chapter 11 quiz and one Try It Out assignment. Add quiz results and the Try-It-Out to portfolio. Read Case 14 and discuss . |
|
|
|
Chapter 11 Lecture
Theories of Mass Communication Relevant to Interpersonal Communication
|
|
How
do media influence interpersonal communication?
Technological Determinism claims that some single cause determines other aspects of life (McLuhan).
Expectation of immediate answer, resolution, information.
Less careful checking of details.
Hurried approach.
Multitasking.
Shortened attention span.

Cultivation Theory claims that technology--particularly television--has a cumulative effect in shaping our view of reality.
Children's sex-role stereotypes seem directly related to the amount of commercial television they watch.
Television can make people think more alike.
Mean world syndrome: The belief that the world is a dangerous place full of people who cannot be trusted and who are likely to harm us.
Media tend to support and normalize established cultural practices and values.
FRIENDS Ross's Teeth -
Friends - scenes with the cheesecake
Do media affect our relationships?
Do you sit and watch television or play on the Internet instead of talk?
Do you become bored with people?
Do you expect problems to be resolved quickly?
Do dialectical tensions seem bad? Does conflict seem bad?
Do we think rudeness is appropriate because of what we see on television?
Case Studies About Relationships (from the Internet)
|
Knowledge Checklist Consider this list of concepts. Imagine that you have a test where you have to write a paragraph about a possible interpersonal communication influence of each of these mass communication concepts.
How many do you know?
|
|
|
Debate!
Television and films have a strong influence on interpersonal communication. Televisions and films give people ideas about what to say and how to act in relationships.
versus
Television and films have no influence on interpersonal communication.
People behave as they were taught by family and friends who model
interpersonal relationships. |
|
|
Review Chapter 11 |
Explain in your own words or give a personal example! |
|
cool media |
McLuhan's term for media that include incomplete sensory data and thus require human involvement and participation. |
|
cultivation |
In cultivation theory, the cumulative process by which television fosters beliefs about social reality, including the belief that the world is more dangerous and violent than it actually is. |
|
cultivation theory |
The point of view that television promotes a view of social reality that may be inaccurate but that viewers nonetheless assume reflects real life. |
|
cultural mainstream |
In cultivation theory, the general view of social life that television constructs. |
|
determinism |
The belief that human behavior is governed by forces beyond individual control, usually biology, environment, or a combination of the two. |
|
electronic epoch |
The fourth era in McLuhan's media history of civilization, ushered in by the invention of the telegraph, which made it possible for people to communicate personally across distance. |
|
hot media |
McLuhan's term for media that include relatively complete sensory data and hence do not require significant human participation. |
|
literate epoch |
The second era in McLuhan's media history of civilization, inaugurated by invention of the phonetic alphabet and during which common symbols allowed people to communicate in writing. |
|
mainstreaming |
In cultivation theory, the effect of television in stabilizing and homogenizing views within a society; one of two processes used to explain television's cultivation of synthetic world views. |
|
mass communication |
Collective term for forms of communication aimed at large audiences. |
|
mean world syndrome |
In cultivation theory, the belief that the world is a dangerous place full of selfish, mean people who cannot be trusted and who are likely to harm others. Cultivation theorists assert that the mean world syndrome is fostered by heavy viewing of television. |
|
multitasking |
Engaging in two or more activities at once or in interacting, overlapping ways. |
|
print epoch |
The third era in McLuhan's media history of civilization, in which invention of the printing press made it possible to mass-produce written materials so that reading was no longer restricted to elite members of society. |
|
resonance |
In cultivation theory, the extent to which something (specifically, phenomena on television) is congruent with personal experience; one of two mechanisms used to explain television's ability to cultivate synthetic world views. |
|
technological determinism |
The point of view that media decisively influence how individuals think, feel, and act, as well as how they view collective life. |
|
tribal epoch |
The first era in McLuhan's media history of civilization, during which the oral tradition reigned and face- to-face talking and listening were primary forms of communication. |
|
Week 11
|
|
Chapter 10 Lecture
Theories about Culture and Communication Communities |
DEVELOPMENTAL THEORIES FROM CHAPTER 10
V. Developmental theories focus on how relationships develop, grow, and decline over time.
A. First generation developmental theories had serious limitations.
1. They were excessively and inappropriately linear.
2. They implied an inevitability to relational development.
3. They did not include, nor apply to, a number of intimate relationships, such as gay and lesbian commitments.
4. They focused on external, observable phenomena to define stages in relational life.
B. Second generation developmental models are more sophisticated and useful. James Honeycutt emphasized that relationships develop not because of events themselves, but because of how we interpret events.
C. Individual have "imagined trajectories," which are their understandings and expectations of the typical paths relationships follow.
1. They are a type of knowledge schemata that guides how we think about what is happening between us and others.
2. Relationships may also have turning points, which exist when we interpret certain relational events or moments as significant in changing the direction or nature of a relationship.
VI. Second generation developmental theories have not been seriously criticized.
The
outsider within
is a person who is inside a particular social group through daily
interactions and activities but is also excluded from that group because the
person is not "one of them."
I. A number of
theories focus on relationships between communication and culture.
A. Communication reflects cultural values and perspectives.
1. The language of different cultures reflects different view of identity. Western cultures tend to emphasize individual, whereas many Eastern cultures place greater emphasis on family and community.
2. In the process of learning language, we learn our culture's values.

B. Language reflects cultural views of identity.
1. Cultures vary in the extent to which they define this in terms of individual or collective/communal criteria.
2. Cultures vary in the extent to which they assume this is rooted in family ties.
II. Standpoint theory entails three central ideas and a premise about the relationship between standpoint and communication.
A. Cultures are organized hierarchically so that different groups experience dissimilar power, opportunities, and perspectives.
Standpoint theory traces how distinct social groups within a society shape members' experiences, knowledge, and ways of interacting.
Speech community theory offers a more specific analysis of how interaction with particular social groups shapes styles of communication that differ for women, men, and members of different ethnicities.
Organizational culture theory illuminates the role of communication increasing and sustaining distinct cultures in organizational life.

Societies define distinct groups not only as different but as differentially worthy, valuable, or capable.
Standpoint arises out of the material, social, and symbolic conditions that shape a group's experiences.
Standpoint is not a birthright.
Standpoint is an achievement--something that is accomplished only if someone who is born into a group engages in political struggle to understand and critically question the conditions that shape the group's life.
|
What do you think?
According to standpoint theory, different social standpoints produce different knowledge. |
Critical race theory examines how laws and legal institutions have constructed race.
1. Georg William Fredrick Hegel discussed the master-slav