|
|
 |
STUDENT RESPONSIBILITY
1: |
Be honest. |
|
BE
HONEST AND ETHICAL
What is ethical student behavior?
Cite and reference all
sources of information and ideas according to American
Psychological Association (APA) style.
Academic integrity is crucial to this
course. In this field, and thus this course, we abide
by the standards of the American Psychological Association (APA)
publication manual.
USE YOUR OWN WORDS
Use your own words
in everything you write or present in this course.
EVERY ASSIGNMENT NEEDS TO BE ORIGINAL WORK PREPARED BY
THE STUDENT ONLY FOR THIS COURSE.
USE PRIMARY SOURCES
Focus on using PRIMARY SOURCES
(journal articles from Communication and Mass Media Complete
or other scholarly databases approved by your professor) and cite and reference everything you
paraphrase.
AVOID DIRECT
QUOTATIONS
Use direct quotations very
sparingly. There may be a particularly eloquent
quotation or a few words you need to quote, which must be
done by use of quotation marks, a citation with page or
paragraph number, and a reference listing.
Remember to avoid direct quotations and instead use
your own words. In the situation where you must quote,
use correct APA style to indicate a direct quotation:
According to Pierce (2010), "the method for . .
. improves communication" (p. 272).
According to Pierce (2010), "the method
for . . . improves communication" (para. 12).
[You actually need to count the paragraphs to indicate the
correct one. This style is often used for scholarly webpages
where there is no page number,
for example.]
According to Pierce
(2010):
The method for . . .
[continue the block quotation of at least 40 words
and not more than 200 words] . . . improves
communication. (p. 272)
BE RESPONSIBLE DURING THE PROCESS
When conducting research and preparing assignments, take
precise, correct, and careful notes. Rename journal
article files so that you can retrieve them when you
download them to your computer. Never copy and paste
from any sources. Instead, rewrite using your own
words by paraphrasing, but also remember to record a reference
listing of the source you used for the idea. Any notes where
you copy the words of others need to be indicated by
quotation marks during the note-taking process and referenced so you remember the source.
If you are unsure, go back and look it up, which fortunately
doesn't take long with today's databases.
AVOID DIRECT
QUOTATIONS
Avoid direct quotations and instead use
your own words.
Use direct quotations very sparingly.
There may be a particularly eloquent quotation or a few
words you need to quote, which must be done by use of
quotation marks, a citation with page or paragraph number,
and a reference listing.
In the situation where you must quote,
use correct APA style to indicate a direct quotation:
According to Pierce, "the method for . .
. improves communication" (p. 272).
According to Pierce (2010), "the method
for . . . improves communication" (para. 12).
[You actually need to count the paragraphs to indicate the
correct one. This style is often used for webpages,
for example.]
According to Pierce
(2010):
the method for . . .
continue the block quotation of at least 40 words
and not more than 200 words . . . improves
communication. (p. 272)
PERMISSIONS
If the quote that is a
whole--something like short like a poem or a measure (e.g.,
test, chart, learning activity, photography, rubric)--the 200 fair use
guideline does not apply. You need to request
permission to use it for publication (including a ERIC
submission or your graduate thesis).
If the source
clearly says it is copyright free or gives permission, you
may use it if you cite and reference the work correctly.
You will see that these published measures are available
copyright free
http://www.jamescmccroskey.com/measures/ provided they
are referenced as indicated.
For visuals, if you look under the
picture AND at the bottom of the page, if it says copyright
or has the copyright symbol, you can't use it for
publication. For Microsoft Word, they do allow use for our
purposes, but you still should say that's the source.
Educational fair use means you can use
something in the classroom or an in-class assignment, but
does NOT apply to publishing for something like your thesis
or ERIC.
Anytime I've asked an author for
permission, they've given it to me. You can probably
find contact information on the Internet.
Big publishing houses usually will not
give permission without a fee. Many communication
measures charge a couple dollars per measure and do not
allow publication.
Once you receive
permission, you need a complete reference listing and add
something like: "Used with permission from
____________." See your APA manual for what you can and
cannot do.
What is unethical student behavior?
Plagiarism in this course is failure to
use American Psychological Association (APA) style by crediting the source of ideas or
information. You will see basic expectations in your
Park University catalog and in your APA manual.
Be aware that the odds against two people
accidentally duplicating a normal sentence in the English
language are astronomical.
Remember, just one sentence
of plagiarism is still plagiarism.
EXAMPLES OF PLAGIARISM
Some
examples of plagiarism
include the following:
1. Using review of literature
information from a journal article without indicating that
you are citing the secondary source. You should look
it up in the original source--primary source--if you plan to
use the information.
2. Failing to use quotation marks when providing a direct
quotation. This includes using words from a journal
article without using quotation marks. This includes lifting a section from a journal
article's review of literature. This includes using an
abstract from a publisher or author.
3. Failing to cite and reference the source of paraphrased
ideas.
4. Using part of an assignment written by the
student, but turned in previously in another course.
5. Using part of an assignment written by another
student or someone else.
6. Copying information with
citations, but failing to use quotation marks for the real
author's words and citing the information as a secondary
source.
7. Citing the source of
information, but failing to use quotation marks to indicate
the words were written by that source.
8. Citing or referencing sources
you haven't read.
9. Using incorrect APA citation style so
the reader is led to believe a source is paraphrased, when
the source is actually quoted word for word.
10. Mixing an actual quotation with
paraphrasing, without using quotation marks for the actual
quoted material.
EXAMPLES OF ACADEMIC DISHONESTY
Academic dishonesty includes unethical
behavior, such as falsification of data. Some examples of
unethical
research or writing include the following:
1. Quoting more than 200 words from
a single source (or a work that is a whole, such as a
measure), even when using quotation marks, a
citation, and reference listing. You must receive
author or publisher permission in this case.
2. Quoting an author's or
publisher's abstract, even if cited.
3. Turning in part of an assignment
you submitted for another course.
4. Implying
you read material you did not read. If you put
material in a bibliography, for example, you are saying that
you read the works in that bibliography, not stole
abstracts about them.
5. Fabrication or omission of data.
6. Making up "information" or using
information from your personal experience, which cannot be
substantiated through scholarly research or practice (and
thus cited and referenced).
|
Why is academic integrity important?
US society values private
ownership, including ownership of ideas.
US academia values the use of truth in
pursuit of the truth (knowledge, learning).
THE
ADVANCEMENT OF
KNOWLEDGE
Universities are dedicated to the
advancement of knowledge, which requires rigor in order to
achieve. We have established precise procedures about
how to increase accurate knowledge.
Consider the implications of failure to
meet those standards:
-
How would you feel if you found out
your surgeon cheated his or her way through medical
school?
-
How would you feel if the surgeon had
been diligent, but the people who conducted the medical
research about the operation had lied about their
research findings?
-
How would you feel if the surgeon had
been diligent, but the people who wrote the surgeon's
college textbooks put the materials together without
regard for whether or not the "information" was true?
Imagine that you turned in a paper in
class and the professor gave an "A" to another student who
turned in nothing, but gave you a "0" (Kline, p. 254).
That's what happens when one person takes credit for someone
else's work.
Academics take this process of academic
integrity very seriously in all
aspects of the advancement of knowledge. We have a
moral obligation to abide--and ensure that our students also
abide--by the rules of scientific inquiry.
|
CONSEQUENCES
Under Park University policy, inappropriate citation or
academic dishonesty as described above can result in a
failing grade for the assignment or for the entire course.
Previously in some communication courses, students have
earned an "F" for an individual assignment that used words
written by someone else without using correct APA citation.
Previously, students in some communication courses have earned an "F" in the course when a major
course assignment (the core assessment assignment) used some
words written by someone else without using correct APA
citation.
In
other words, you should expect an "F" in the course if there
is evidence of any kind of plagiarism or academic dishonesty
on the course's final Core Assessment assignment, the
graduate comprehensive exams, the senior project, or the
graduate reflection, project, or thesis.
ACTUALLY
READ THE PRIMARY SOURCE
Remember, everything needs to be cited, whether paraphrased or direct
quotes. You should always
use the original (primary) source. If you can't
find it and have to cite from
a secondary source, you need to say so because the author
doing the citing may be wrong and you must not imply that
you have read the original source. You would write a secondary
cite like this: McCroskey found . . . (cited in Richmond,
2010).
Remember, you cannot lift
a section from a review of literature in a journal article
and use it as your own because that is plagiarism. You
must read the articles you are citing and referencing, then
write the information in your own words.
TURNITIN
Faculty may use plagiarism detection software to determine
whether the content can be found through the Internet,
published sources, or in an assignment submitted by another
student at another university.
See the explanation below (http://onlineacademics.org/Guidelines.html#TURNITIN
).
|
HOW TO INTERPRET A
TURNITIN
ORIGINALITY REPORT
You need to look at the
Turnitin plagiarism report and analyze what is there. To
make sense of a Turnitin report, examine each duplicated
item carefully.
As a
computer generated report, the computer finds some
duplication that is plagiarism and some that is not.
There are certain words commonly used in
academe, such as "At the end of this unit, the student
should be able to." Obviously, this kind of
duplication is not a problem.
The colored part of your paper shows you words that
were found elsewhere in articles, on the Internet, or
submitted by students at Park or other universities. There is a number
and color coding linked to the sources of duplication. For any colored section in
the report in the body of your paper, you need to the put
direct quotation marks or a block quote properly cited in APA style, or totally rewrite the
section in your own words.
The duplicated words are
color coded to the numbered sources (located at the
beginning of the report). The percentage of
duplication is shown for each source. The numbers are
cross-referenced to indicate the source where the computer
found the original words.
WARNINGS
The source where the original words were found may or may
not be where you found the quote. For example, if
another student at another university copied a paragraph
from a journal article, and you copied from the same journal
article, and the Turnitin system does not have the original
journal article in the database, the plagiarism report will
mistakenly show the other student as the original source.
You should cite the original article where you found the
material, not necessarily the source on the plagiarism
report.
If you use material and
just change a few key words from the quote, then the
words will be similar enough for the computer to catch the
duplication. I understand that sometimes you may want
to quote exactly, so in that case make sure you use a block
quote (40 words or more) or quotation marks and give the
page number.
Remember, direct quotation
should be used sparingly. Never exceed quoting more
than 200 words from an article.
VALUABLE TOOL
Being able to detect duplication requires access to
a networking system like Turnitin (which is
extremely expensive) and considerable time and
effort on my part. So it's not something I check all
the time. Students need to be responsible for making
sure they write everything in their own words and
cite everything.
I do
check everything submitted to me for publication in
my books. I also check my own work with the
software to make sure I haven't accidently missed
anything.
I
would hope students use their own words and cite
properly in all cases, but anything I ask students
to submit for publication needs to be perfect (to
ERIC or the graduate thesis).
EXCEPTIONS
Sometimes the duplicated
words shown on the report may simply be a common
expression or a reference listing, then the duplication is not a matter of
copying anyone, and you don't need to make changes.
The parenthetical citations and reference list should NOT
be in your own words, but in APA style. It's normal and
correct that you and other people would reference materials
exactly the same way in APA style. So, don't put quotation
marks around your reference list items.
|
|
Review of Literature
Online Collaboration
I would give myself an
Automatic F
for Academic Dishonesty
In recent years, online collaboration and support
have been an areas of research that interest
academics in higher education (e.g.,
Barker, VanSchaik, & Famakinwa, 2007; Curtis
& Lawson, 2001; Petrides, 2002; Whatley & Bell, 2003).
Online groups provide opportunities for
learning and empathy for people who share interests
or concerns. In fact, the value of online support
groups can be as important to the members as a
face-to-face support groups are to their members
(Turner, Grube, & Meyers, 2001). This finding
suggests that online community may be extremely
important to students too.
For online students, e-learning can be successful
and provide some advantages (Luppicini, 2007). In
fact, some faculty believe that the online format
works extremely well for reflection and opinion
discussion. Further, the sense of anonymity in the
nature of online interaction may actually increase
the quality and depth of member responses through
personal disclosure, reciprocity, and personal
acceptance (VanLear, Sheehan, Withers & Walker,
2005).
Every teacher knows that each class develops a
personality. The social construction of the learning
collaboration creates something unique based on the
people who interact together. This personality or
social construction seems less clear in the online
environment. Scholars have discussed the need for
students and teachers to determine where they will
locate themselves in the social space of the
classroom (Anagnostopoulos, Basmadjian, & McCrory,
2005). They suggested that not
only does the virtual classroom lack the shared
expectations and social conventions associated with
the face-to-face classroom, it also lacks markers
that root it in any particular place. Unlike
face-to-face
classrooms, virtual classrooms are radically
disassociated from the locales in which
teachers and students live their everyday lives.
Identifying the textual devices teachers and
students use to construct social presence in online
classrooms is a step towards understanding how
teachers and students respond to the delocalized
classroom space. Faculty may be able to
create some social conventions and locate the
classroom in a space. One would suspect that a
possible outcome, however, might be that unless
faculty and students can create a collaborative
learning environment, online learning may be less
meaningful, less engaging, or less motivating than
the face-to-face environment.
References
Aitken, J.
E. (2008). Communication. Kansas City, MO:
OnlineAcademics.Org. Retrieved June 24, 2009 from
http://onlineacademics.org
Anagnostopoulos, D.,
Basmadjian,
K. G., &
McCrory, R. S. (2005).
The decentered teacher and the
construction of social space in the
virtual classroom.
Teachers
College Record,
107(8),
1699–1729.
Barker, P., VanSchaik, P., & Famakinwa, O. (2007).
Building electronic performance support systems for
first-year university students. Innovations in
Education and Teaching International, 44(3),
243–255.
Curtis, D. D., & Lawson, M. J. (2001). Exploring
collaborative online learning. JALN, 5(1),
21-34.
Luppicini, R. (2007). Review of computer
mediated communication research for education.
Instructional Science, 35(2), 141-185.
Petrides, L. (2002). Web-based technologies
for distributed (or distance) learning: Creating
learning-centered educational experiences in the
higher education classroom.
International Journal of Instructional Media,
29(1), 69.
Turner, J., Grube,
J., & Meyers, J. (2001). Developing an optimal match
with in online communities: an exploration of CMC
support communities and traditional support.
Journal of Communication, 51(2), 231-251.
Valacich, J. S., Paranka, D., George, J. F., &
Nunamaker, J. F. (1993). Communication concurrency
and the new media: A new dimension for media
richness. Communication Research, 20(2),
249-276.
VanLear, C. A., Sheehan, M. A., Withers, L.
A., & Walker, R. A. (2005). AA online: The enactment
of computer mediated social support. Western
Journal of Communication, 69(1), 5-26.
Whatley, J., & Bell, F. (2003). Discussion
across borders: Benefits for collaborative learning.
Educational Media International, 40(1/2),
139.
|
|
Here is the Plagiarism Report
Review of
Literature Online Collaboration I would give myself
an Automatic F for Academic Dishonesty In recent
years, online collaboration and support have been an
areas of research that interest academics in higher
education (e.g., Barker, VanSchaik, & Famakinwa,
2007; Curtis & Lawson, 2001; Petrides, 2002; Whatley
& Bell, 2003). Online
2groups provide
opportunities for learning and empathy for people
who share interests or concerns. In fact,
2the value of online
support groups can be as important to the members as
a face-to-face support groups are to their members
(Turner, Grube, & Meyers, 2001).
[Aitken
wrote this information and published on her website.
For a course, it's inappropriate to use information
submitted for another course, even if the student
wrote the information] This finding
suggests that online community may be extremely
important to students too. For online students,
e-learning can be successful and provide some
advantages (Luppicini, 2007). In fact, some faculty
believe that the online format works extremely well
for reflection and opinion discussion.
2Further, the sense of
anonymity in the nature of online interaction may
actually increase the quality and depth of member
responses through personal disclosure, reciprocity,
and personal acceptance (VanLear, Sheehan, Withers &
Walker, 2005). Every teacher knows that each
class develops a personality. The social
construction of the learning collaboration creates
something unique based on the people who interact
together. This personality or social construction
seems less clear in the online environment. Scholars
have discussed the need for students and teachers to
determine where they will locate themselves
1in the social space of
the classroom (Anagnostopoulos, Basmadjian, &
McCrory, 2005). They suggested that
1not only does the
virtual classroom lack the shared expectations and
social conventions associated with the face-to-face
classroom, it also lacks markers that root it in any
particular place. Unlike face-to-face classrooms,
virtual classrooms are radically disassociated from
the locales in which teachers and students live
their everyday lives. Identifying the textual
devices teachers and students use to construct
social presence in online classrooms is a step
towards understanding how teachers and students
respond to the delocalized classroom space.
[Although the source is identified, the fact that
these are the words of Anagnostopoulous, Basmadjian,
and McCrory constitutes plagiarism. This
section needs to be in quotation marks or set off as
a block quote, with the page number in parentheses
at the end.] Faculty may be able to create
some social conventions and locate the classroom in
a space. One would suspect that a possible outcome,
however, might be that unless faculty and students
can create a collaborative learning environment,
online learning may be less meaningful, less
engaging, or less motivating than the face-to-face
environment. References Anagnostopoulos, D.,
Basmadjian, K. G., & McCrory, R. S. (2005). The
decentered teacher and the construction of social
space in the virtual classroom. Teachers College
Record, 107(8), 1699–1729. Barker, P., VanSchaik,
P., & Famakinwa, O. (2007). Building electronic
performance support systems for first-year
university students. Innovations in Education and
Teaching International, 44(3), 243–255. Curtis, D.
D., & Lawson, M. J. (2001). Exploring collaborative
online learning. JALN, 5(1), 21-34. Luppicini, R.
(2007). Review of computer mediated communication
research for education. Instructional Science,
35(2), 141-185. Petrides, L. (2002). Web-based
technologies for distributed (or distance) learning:
Creating learning-centered educational experiences
in the higher education classroom. International
Journal of Instructional Media, 29(1), 69. Turner,
J., Grube, J., & Meyers, J. (2001). Developing an
optimal match with in online communities: an
exploration of CMC support communities and
traditional support. Journal of Communication,
51(2), 231-251. Valacich, J. S., Paranka, D.,
George, J. F., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1993).
Communication concurrency and the new media: A new
dimension for media richness. Communication
Research, 20(2), 249-276. VanLear, C. A., Sheehan,
M. A., Withers, L. A., & Walker, R. A. (2005). AA
online: The enactment of computer mediated social
support. Western Journal of Communication, 69(1),
5-26. Whatley, J., & Bell, F. (2003). Discussion
across borders: Benefits for collaborative learning.
Educational Media International, 40(1/2), 139.
|
|
Here are the identified sources.
|
If this information feels
foreign to you, and it may, you can find excellent
information on the Internet to help you learn how to conduct
ethical academic work.
Information Literacy Student Learning activity packets. (2009).
SDSU Library & Information Access. Retrieved from
http://infodome.sdsu.edu/infolit/learningpackets.shtml
Exploring plagiarism, copyright, and
paraphrasing. (2002-2009). IRA/NCTE.
Retrieved from
http://www.readwritethink.org/lessons/lesson_view.asp?id=1062
|
What is ethical
research on human subjects\? |
|
This information
quoted or closely adapted from the Park University
Institutional Review Board (IRB), APA, and course
materials.
Ethical experimental research
protects human safety and privacy. Any research on human
subjects must be reviewed and approved before data
collection. Ethical
research avoids deception. The Park University Institutional
Review Board (IRB) must approve any research on human
subjects in advance. Fraud is an issue of concern.
No researcher can put an
individual at risk.
1.
We must ensure that the participant participates only after
fully informed, and when consent to participate is give.
2.
We can do nothing from which the research can gain.
3.
We must not do anything that damages the environment.
4.
We cannot do biased research.
5. We cannot fabricate data or
information, use fraud, or falsify anything to anyone during
the research process.
APA guidelines require the
following:
1.
Minimal risk.
2.
Fairness, responsibility, and informed consent
(adults).
3.
If the researcher can justify deception, there must
be debriefing.
4.
Freedom from coercion.
5.
Protection of participants.
6.
Confidentiality.
Because of federal law,
you should expect the following restrictions regarding
research on human subjects.
-
You canNOT
use participants under
18,
-
Cannot use participants who
are members of a protected population (no one pregnant,
no one in prison, no one with a mental disability),
-
Cannot conduct research that
provides any financial gain to anyone,
-
Cannot collect health
information,
-
Cannot collect names or
demographic information,
-
Cannot conduct research that
involves anything beyond minimal risk,
-
Cannot use deception of any
kind.
-
Cannot use Video or Audiotaping because of the complicated record keeping
required by federal law.
-
Cannot use a sensitive topic
(e.g., sensitive topics include drug use, sexual
practices, aggressive behavior, criminal activity).
|
 |
STUDENT RESPONSIBILITY
1: |
Respect
diversity through rhetorical sensitivity. |
|
Please use oral, nonverbal,
visual, and written rhetorical sensitivity.
Ethical communicators select language carefully,
build common ground, and offer collaborative approaches to
people of differing opinions.
Ethical public relations professionals build common
ground, bridge differences, mediate differences, develop
cohesion, and encourage civility. Here is the PRSA code:
http://www.prsa.org/aboutUs/ethics/preamble_en.html If
you are in a public relations course, you should know what
public relations is
http://www.prsa.org/aboutUs/officialStatement.html
People with rhetorical sensitivity apologize to people whom
they offend. An effective apology generally contains
these elements: I apologize for __(what was said or
done)___. The reason for my behavior was ________.
It won't happen again because I will ____take these
steps____.
Park University policy states: "As a student, you have the right
to an opportunity to learn in an environment that is free
from discrimination based on race, color, creed, religion,
gender, marital status, sexual orientation, national origin,
age, disability, or veteran status. It is the
responsibility of all members of the Park University
community – students, faculty, and staff – to create and
maintain an environment where all persons are treated with
respect, dignity, and fairness. Students have
responsibility for assuming the consequences of their
actions. Students are expected to accept their obligations
to the entire Park community to honor and respect the value
and integrity of each person and to conduct themselves
accordingly. In addition,
students are responsible for making themselves aware of Park
University policies and procedures, all of which are
outlined in the Catalog, in the Student Handbook/Planner,
and/or on the Park University website:
www.park.edu/policies."
http://www.park.edu/studentlife/conduct.html
If anyone in this course
wants to file a complaint, please go to:
http://www.park.edu/studentlife/ReportCodeViolation/
Denigration of other people or groups is not acceptable.
Effective communicators use rhetorical sensitivity. That
means students need to adapt to audiences (faculty, staff,
students) with care and use communication that shows an
other-centered perception of respect diverse people. This
means respect is needed regarding gender, nationality,
ethnicity, racial identification, sexual orientation,
disability status, and similar elements. No profanity,
crude, or vulgar language. Respectful communicators use
empathy and see to carefully adapt to the needs, wants, and
expectations of their listener/reader/audience.
|
 |
STUDENT RESPONSIBILITY
2: |
Show up.
Be on time. |
|
Responsible
communicators show up.
Communication is a performance course requiring attendance.
In US
culture, which is a low context, monochronic culture, time
has literal meaning. In other words, when people say a time
and date, they mean that time and date. Public relations
professionals, for example, complete the job done by the
client's deadline or are fired! Because an objective of
this course is for you to be a more effective communicator,
you will need to meet assignment deadlines. This policy
also allows my time management, fairness to all students,
and the effective use of the entire class meeting time.
Expect to lose
participation points if you are late more than a few times
or significantly late.
You may miss participation points any time you are absent.
All
assignments are due as hardcopy at the beginning of the
class meeting of the due date.
For
online students, they are due by Sunday weeks 1-7 or
Friday week 8 in electronic form in eCollege. Assignments
are NOT accepted via email.
LATE WORK
Different
courses and levels may have different requirements.
1.
Excused time extensions
require a physician's excuse or
comparable verification.
2.
FOR MINOR
ASSIGNMENTS--If you need to miss
class, submit the assignment in the eCollege/eCompanion dropbox by the
weekly assignment by the class time on the due date.
PARTICIPATION--If you fail to turn
in a participation or weekly assignment by the original deadline, even if
excused, you should expect a zero.
SPEECH PLANNING
DOCUMENTS are due as hardcopy at the beginning of class
or at the same time in the eCompanion dropbox and cannot be
submitted late.
You cannot revise a late
assignment to raise your grade.
In-class
participation, in-class assignments, or collaboration
assignments cannot be made up outside of class.
Because of the unique performance
nature of many communication course, students need to be
prepared to make presentations when scheduled.
3.
FOR MAJOR ASSIGNMENTS, submit an additional research paper
about using time for effective communication. LATE
SPEECH --For a
late speech, you will need to present an apologetic speech
to the class, which gives research based information about
how we use time to communicate competence.
Both assignments are due
within one week of the original due date or the assigned
makeup date, typically doubling
the work. No extra credit points for this assignment. The
additional assignment should be of comparable quality and
substance. In addition to the required research paper.
The original assignment is
typically docked 10-50% (e.g., 10% if less than one week
late, 20% if less than two weeks late), and so on.
See additional information here:
http://onlineacademics.org/Guidelines.html#BE_ON_TIME
Example Reference List about Being On
Time
Adam, B. (1995) Timewatch: The social analysis of time.
Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bluedorn, A. C., & Denhardt, R. B. (1988). Time and
organizations. Journal of Management 14(2), 299–320.
Bluedorn, A. C., Kalliath, T. J., Strube, M. J., & Martin,
G. D. (1999). Polychronicity
and the Inventory of
Polychronic Values (IPV): The development of an instrument
to measure a fundamental dimension of organizational
Culture. Journal of Managerial Psychology 14(3–4),
205–230.
Bollen, K. A. (1989) Structural equations with latent
variables. New York: Wiley.
Bond, M. J., & Feather, N. T. (1988). Some correlates of
structure and purpose in the use of time. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 55(2), 321–329.
Daly, K. J. (1996)
Families & time:
Keeping pace in a hurried culture.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
George, D., Dixon, S., Stansal, E., Gelb,
S., & Pheri, T. (2008). Time
diary and questionnaire assessment of factors associated
with academic and personal success among university
undergraduates. Journal of American College Health,
56(6), 706-715.
Communication professionals are
on time. Being late communicates
negatively nonverbally. The research suggests that
people who are late consider themselves more powerful and
superior to the rest of the group. Consider these
findings about people in the US who are late:
"In cultures that value promptness, one
of the questions raised about time centers on the person who
is constantly late. What does habitual tardiness reveal
about the person?
"Chronic lateness, in a formal-time
culture, may be deeply rooted in a person’s psyche.
Compulsive tardiness is rewarding on some level. A key
emotional conflict for the chronically late person involves
his or her need to feel special. Such a person may not gain
enough recognition in other ways; people must be special in
some way, so the person is special by being late.
Other reasons include needs for
punishment or power or as an expression of hostility.
Tardiness can also be a sign that a person wants to avoid
something or that the activity or person to be met is not
important enough to warrant the effort to be on time.
Procrastinators are often not valued in a linear
time-focused culture" (cited in Berko, Wolvin, & Wolvin,
2009, p. 81).
Berko, R., Wolvin, A., & Wolvin, D. (2009). Communicating: A social, career and
cultural focus. Boston: Pearson.

http://captions.illmeyer.com/

http://captions.illmeyer.com/
In all
of Dr. Aitken's courses, the core
assessment is due about 3/4 of the way through the course,
which is typically week 12 in a 16 week course and week 6 in an 8
week course. By requiring this early date well in advance
of the last week of the course, I have grading time for me
to give careful thought to your work. In addition, I have
found that student work quality is better if the major
assignment is due prior to the end of the course. Most
importantly, this gives time for you to revise your work
according to my suggestions so that it meets mastery quality
by the end of the course.
Communication professionals meet deadlines. Remember, an
otherwise perfect core assessment should receive no more
than 80% if submitted late.
In
onground courses,
NO revisions or core assessment will be accepted after the
beginning of the last regular class meeting of the course.
In
online courses,
NO course work,
revisions or core assessment will be accepted after
Wednesday of the last week of the course.
If you are
having difficulty because of course content, personal
emergencies, or procrastination about assignments, please
withdraw from the course by the final deadline. If
your professor suggests course withdrawal, you should do so.
Unless you have 75% of the course work completed, you cannot
expect an "incomplete." The incomplete is not an
option for excessive absences or procrastination.
See your Park catalog or the Park website about how to
obtain a grade of "withdrawal," deadlines, and other
information about incompletes. The final withdrawal
date is prior to midterm (Friday or week four for an
8 week course). See the Park academic calendar to see
the exact date.
For an incomplete,
please submit a physician's or other appropriate
verification of the emergency situation. See your
Park catalog for information about incompletes.
An incomplete
doesn't work for procrastinators because the grade turns to
the grade of "F" in 60 days, so they are discouraged.
If you want
an incomplete, upload into eCollege or eCompanion your
completed form, detailed plan, and a message about why you
are requesting to complete. In this form, you must
lay out a plan to your professor in which you describe
exactly what you will do to make up for every missed
assignment. You need to explain your plan for exactly
how you will accomplish the objectives of assignment and
your schedule for completing each assignment.
You must submit your completed contract
for an incomplete, your plan, and written request by the
Friday prior to final exam week (Friday of week 7 for an
8-week course or 15 for a 16-week course).
It is completely
the student's responsibility--not the professor's--to figure
out a way to make up for missed work and attached those
details to the form. The makeup work needs to meet the
relevant objectives (learning outcomes) and be of comparable
depth and breadth of the original work.
To ensure
instructor grading time, all assignment need to be submitted
one week prior to the final deadline (day 53). You
will NOT have access to an online course. If your
professor agrees to the plan and the grade of "incomplete,"
then the student is completely responsible for submitting
everything without additional instruction from the
professor.
For graduate
students, below is information received from
an administrative officer.
"Additionally, if relevant, allow me to call your attention
to the Incomplete (“I”) policy found on page 33 of the 08-09
Graduate Catalog. Summarizing, “I” grades should only be
issued for coursework not completed in the time allotted
through no fault of the student. “I” grades should not be
given to a student who has unexcused or excessive absences
recorded for the course."
Some
courses offer extra credit as a privilege to students and some courses offer no extra
credit. In fairness to all students. I avoid making
individual deals with students or giving opportunities for
extra credit or special considerations that only apply to
one student.
Extra credit is a privilege
designed to help students making an honest effort in a
course. Thus, no course extra credit is available to
students who appear to have used academic dishonesty.
No extra credit is available if students fail to meet
original deadlines.
Typically, when figuring final grades, if I make a mistake
in your favor, you can keep it to yourself and consider
yourself lucky.
Remember, students
who badger me wanting grades and feedback less than a week
from the due date should expect to lose the privilege of
earning extra credit in the course.
Please focus on
completing all the required work without extra
accommodations.

http://captions.illmeyer.com/
|
IF LATE
TO CLASS,
PLEASE WAIT OUTSIDE DURING STUDENT PRESENTATIONS.
ENTER QUIETLY IF CLASS HAS
BEGUN.
Role is taken during the first
few minutes of class. If you're not there, you
are marked absent for the purposes of class
participation points and attendance reporting to the
University. |
Onground students
need to submit their assignments on time, at the beginning
of the class meeting, as a hardcopy.
If you are in an online
course or unable to submit the assignment face-to-face as a
hardcopy, upload into the dropbox (or document sharing) in
eCollege by the due date class time. If you have a
question or problem, please talk to me face-to-face instead
via email. Because of the University's email blocking
system and the high volume of emails,
assignments are only
accepted in class or in eCollege
(eCompanion), NOT by email.
Online students
need to submit their assignments on time in the appropriate
eCollege dropbox or posting area.
For all students, only
Microsoft
Office Suite files or rtf, txt, PDF will be accepted.
Park classroom projection computers and faculty computers
cannot use .docx or .pptx formats, so you must save to an
older version.
No other formats are
available electronically at this time. USE ONE FILE
for a particular assignment by combining needed elements.
Assignments are not accepted via email.
MAKE SURE
YOUR LAST NAME BEGINS THE FILE NAME. Use a specific and
descriptive file name. Name the file name with your last
name, first name, course, assignment, semester, version. For
example, I would name a file as follows:
AitkenJoanCA680ProjectFall2010Version3.doc
PLEASE CHANGE THE VERSION NUMBER WITH EACH REVISION
SUBMISSION.

|
 |
RESPONSIBILITY 3: |
Prepare
in advance and engage in
class. |
|
You
cannot make up in-class participation assignments or grades
because they are just that--in class participation where you
learn collaboratively. Typically, you earn points for doing
the in-class activities.
Students who are more than a few minutes late or absent
for more than a few class meetings should
expect absences to negatively affect the final grade as
compared to what they would have earned if actively participating in
the whole class sessions.
|
 |
RESPONSIBILITY 4: |
Contribute to a learning
environment with professionalism.
|
|
|
TURN OFF
CELL PHONES,
PAGERS, BLACKBERRIES IN CLASS MEETINGS |
|
Be sure to cite the sources of ALL
INFORMATION, whether quoted or paraphrased. Cite AND
reference in all forms of communication (oral speech
presentations and written assignments). For a speech,
you can say "According to the CDC. . ." or put an APA
citation on your PowerPoint slide. The written format for
this course is APA citations for all paraphrased or directly
quoted sources. Plagiarism is the use of sources without
citation. This is a citation (Shedletsky & Aitken,
2004, p. 343) and this is a reference listing:
Shedletsky, L. J., &
Aitken, J. E. (2004). Human communication on the Internet.
Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Longman.
|
NO ANIMALS IN THE
CLASSROOM PLEASE |
|
Unfortunately, when public speaking students have brought
animals to our classroom, it worked out badly. Stress on
the animals caused unexpected behaviors and certain students
who are afraid of animals were upset. I love animals as
much as anyone, but If you want to talk about an animal
during a speech presentation, the appropriate approach is to
bring pictures.
Competent communicators are careful about the messages of
their appearance and vocal qualities as nonverbal
communication. Remember, you must be heard to be understood. Speak loudly and clearly so that you can
be heard by everyone, including an audience member who has a
hearing loss. Convey a passion or enthusiasm for your
topic and message via your voice.
|
Research says that more formal clothing and
appearance increases a speaker's credibility. At the minimum, professionalism suggests no
headgear, no pajamas, no rubbery flip-flops, no
shorts, no bare midriff/chest, and no outdoor
jackets or hoodies.

If your
appearance distracts or creates a weak impression
with the audience, you will lose effectiveness.
For a skilled approach, look and sound like a
professional.

"IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT is
the process of managing setting, words, nonverbal
communication, and dress in an effort to create a
particular image of individuals and situations. According to Goffman (1959), our efforts to create
and project certain impressions may be either highly
calculated or unintentional" (Wood, 2004, p.
119-120). In this class, you are in-training to be
an organizational communication professional. A
professional appearance and manner is needed for
success, whether you go into nonprofit work,
education, or business. Therefore, you need to pay
attention to how you manage your image and
impression, particularly when making a course
presentation to the class.
|
|